Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support xa protocol #261

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2022
Merged

feat: support xa protocol #261

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2022

Conversation

dk-lockdown
Copy link
Collaborator

ref: #259

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

support:

XA {START|BEGIN} xid 

XA END xid

XA PREPARE xid

XA COMMIT xid

XA ROLLBACK xid

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 27, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #261 (80af84e) into dev (97c5e18) will decrease coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #261      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   43.38%   43.25%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          82       82              
  Lines        9979    10009      +30     
==========================================
  Hits         4329     4329              
- Misses       5196     5226      +30     
  Partials      454      454              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/executor/read_write_splitting.go 42.59% <0.00%> (-3.18%) ⬇️
pkg/executor/single_db.go 44.62% <0.00%> (-3.92%) ⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@dk-lockdown dk-lockdown merged commit 6611c17 into CECTC:dev Sep 5, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 5, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants