You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
allows to recover from a (initially) far too small sample variance
increases the convergence speed (like on the sphere function)
allow that the number of evaluations scales linearly with increasing dimension (like on the sphere function)
Now, I am looking for an example where step-size adaptation decisively helps but that does not fall in any of the above categories. That is, a function where CMA-ES with step-size adaptation works but without step-size adaptation fails even when the initial variance is chosen large enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Step-size adaptation has the following benefits:
allows to recover from a (initially) far too small sample variance
increases the convergence speed (like on the sphere function)
allow that the number of evaluations scales linearly with increasing dimension (like on the sphere function)
Now, I am looking for an example where step-size adaptation decisively helps but that does not fall in any of the above categories. That is, a function where CMA-ES with step-size adaptation works but without step-size adaptation fails even when the initial variance is chosen large enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: