Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DC-0 Validation spectra: Synchrotron #29

Closed
zonca opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

DC-0 Validation spectra: Synchrotron #29

zonca opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@zonca
Copy link
Member

zonca commented Jun 2, 2023

@giuspugl the other issue I noted, also in simonsobs/map_based_simulations#44 (comment) is spikes at high-ell in the Synchrotron maps.

image
image
image

Should check if they are still there when masking.

@giuspugl
Copy link

giuspugl commented Jun 3, 2023

hello, not sure what it might cause this honestly .
those are spikes at ell= 3000 with overtunes at its integer multiples, i.e. 6000 and 9000. can it be pixel window function of the template?

@giuspugl
Copy link

giuspugl commented Jun 7, 2023

have identified the cause.
it 's not related to the way we inject small scales, but it's due to the fact that we currently employ the real observations inside the Galactic plane and do not inject any small scale in the mask below :
image
There might be something silly that is making the spectra to explode at around ell=3000, see the light blue line below
image
It seems that this might have overtunes at integer multipoles, not sure why ...
Indeed if i don't apply the mask and inject small scales also inside the Gal. plane, we don't have that jump anymore.

I've tried to narrow the mask above so that we won't have this inconsistency, but it seems something related to the Galactic center, or some pixel effect related to the template input maps .

I would propose to give up on including real observations in the Galactic plane small scales , thoughts?

@zonca
Copy link
Member Author

zonca commented Jun 9, 2023

@giuspugl I agree, it also simplifies the dust models. Alternatively what if we apply just a tiny bit of smoothing to the real data to smooth out pixel effects? Is it confirmed that the problem is ud_grade?

It would be good to have feedback from @seclark and @brandonshensley.

@giuspugl
Copy link

Alternatively what if we apply just a tiny bit of smoothing to the real data to smooth out pixel effects?

well, this seems to me a bit as an epicycle approach. We need to convolve the template by a beam of ~5' to avoid that spectra explodes at ell=2000. Although it seems totally feasible , it 's true that few users would look at the ell=2000 power spectrum of Gal. plane...

@seclark
Copy link

seclark commented Jun 21, 2023

Recording that we discussed this on the PanEx call today and plan to not make the change for now, but to note it as a caveat to the models in the current paper. We do not expect that this will affect typical use cases since these models are not designed to reproduce the power spectrum of the Galactic center, and we will address this in the future as we update our treatment of small scale structure in bright regions anyway.

@zonca
Copy link
Member Author

zonca commented Jun 27, 2023

documented in PySM, see the linked issues.

@zonca zonca closed this as completed Jun 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants