Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] S3-PUG-STC IPF crashes on some S3A_SY_2_SYN products #1033

Open
5 of 12 tasks
eroan-marie opened this issue Jul 11, 2023 · 12 comments
Open
5 of 12 tasks

[BUG] S3-PUG-STC IPF crashes on some S3A_SY_2_SYN products #1033

eroan-marie opened this issue Jul 11, 2023 · 12 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working CCB Issue for CCB ipf Limitation The issue causes limitations ops Ticket from ADS operation team priority:blocking Set the priority to blocking because the production is blocked S3 Relative to Sentinel-3 RS Addons to_be_fixed_phase1 Issue to be fixed for RS phase 1 WERUM dev Ticket dedicated to WERUM development

Comments

@eroan-marie
Copy link

Environment:

  • Delivery tag:1.13.2-rc1
  • Platform: OPS Orange Cloud
  • Configuration:

Traceability:

Current Behavior:

IPF crashes while processing some S3A_SY_2_SYN products

Expected Behavior:

Processing should work fine

Steps To Reproduce:

Try processing several S3A_SY_2_SYN products and see error below

Test execution artefacts (i.e. logs, screenshots…)
Tip: You can attach images or log files by dragging & dropping, selecting or pasting them.
s3-pug-stc.log

Whenever possible, first analysis of the root cause

Bug Generic Definition of Ready (DoR)

  • The affect version in which the bug has been found is mentioned
  • The context and environment of the bug is detailed
  • The description of the bug is clear and unambiguous
  • The procedure (steps) to reproduce the bug is clearly detailed
  • The tested User Story / features is linked to the bug if available
  • Logs are attached if available
  • A data set attached if available

Bug Generic Definition of Done (DoD)

  • the modification implemented (the solution to fix the bug) is described in the bug.
  • Unit tests & Continuous integration performed - Test results available - Structural Test coverage reported by SONAR
  • Code committed in GIT with right tag or Analysis/Trade Off documentation up-to-date in reference-system-documentation repository
  • Code is compliant with coding rules (SONAR Report as evidence)
  • Acceptance criteria of the related User story are checked and Passed
@eroan-marie eroan-marie added bug Something isn't working CCB Issue for CCB ops Ticket from ADS operation team S3 Relative to Sentinel-3 RS Addons labels Jul 11, 2023
@w-jka
Copy link

w-jka commented Jul 12, 2023

@eroan-marie
Based on the provided logs, it seems, that two identical SYN intervals with different creation times were provided to the IPF. I would assume, that this might be the root cause, why the processor ran into an error in the NetCDF library.

@LAQU156
Copy link

LAQU156 commented Jul 12, 2023

IVV_CCB_2023_w28 : Moved into "Accepted Werum" for correction, Priority blocking, seems similar as #1022, to be fixed phase 1

@LAQU156 LAQU156 added priority:blocking Set the priority to blocking because the production is blocked to_be_fixed_phase1 Issue to be fixed for RS phase 1 WERUM dev Ticket dedicated to WERUM development labels Jul 12, 2023
@LAQU156
Copy link

LAQU156 commented Jul 12, 2023

Werum_CCB_2023_w28 : Moved into "Product Backlog" to see if a fix can be provided without change the tasktable

@w-jka
Copy link

w-jka commented Jul 13, 2023

@eroan-marie
After further investigation this issue does not seem to be related to #1022. There are no duplicated input validation time frames. As the issue happens inside of the IPF logic, and is related to the NetCDF library, this issue is not fixable by Werum in its current state. Please refer to the IPF provider with the logs of the IPF.

Candidate for refusal.

@pcuq-ads
Copy link

pcuq-ads commented Jul 26, 2023

Werum_CCB_2023_w30 : One hypothesis is that this could be a baseline issue. This is under test on ADS side.

@SYTHIER-ADS
Copy link

After the test with a consistent baseline, we have exactly the same behavior. Issue is to be analysed by Werum

@w-jka
Copy link

w-jka commented Jul 31, 2023

@SYTHIER-ADS
Was this issue provided to the IPF provider? If yes, what was the answer to this issue?

@Woljtek Woljtek added the ipf label Aug 22, 2023
@Woljtek
Copy link

Woljtek commented Aug 24, 2023

The issue PSC-67 has been created on ESA side.
We are waiting for feedback to go further.

@pcuq-ads
Copy link

This is clearly a limitation for the system.

@pcuq-ads pcuq-ads added the Limitation The issue causes limitations label Aug 25, 2023
@suberti-ads
Copy link

PDGSANOM-14095 created

@suberti-ads
Copy link

For information this issue occurred on both satellite

@suberti-ads
Copy link

suberti-ads commented Apr 12, 2024

New occurrence 19 errors for SY_2_SYN products in PUG STC

[code 290] [exitCode 255] [msg Task /usr/local/components/PUG-3.48/bin/PUGCoreProcessor failed]

error

2024-04-12T01:20:31+00:00	2024-04-12T01:20:31.707479 s3-pug-stc-part1-execution-worker-v12-d7546576c-x6l6d PUG_SY_2_SYN 03.48 [0000000107]: [I] PUGCoreProcessor: Exiting with EXIT CODE: 255
2024-04-12T01:20:31+00:00		FATAL: All the product data unit generations exited in error!
2024-04-12T01:20:31+00:00		Size mismatching!2024-04-12T01:20:31.707379 s3-pug-stc-part1-execution-worker-v12-d7546576c-x6l6d PUG_SY_2_SYN 03.48 [0000000107]: [E] PUGCoreProcessor: [PUGCoreProcessor.C: execute:(359)] Unable to generate the required PDUs! --- acs::exCriticalException in PDUGenerator.C(270) from void acs::PDUGenerator::createPDUs() thread "" [139970633246912]
2024-04-12T01:20:31+00:00		acs::Netcdf4Copy::exNetcdf4CopyCriticalException in Netcdf4Copy.C(418) from static void acs::Netcdf4Copy::concatVars(const netCDF::NcVar&, const netCDF::NcVar&, netCDF::NcVar&, const size_t&) thread "unnamedThread" [139970183141120]
2024-04-12T01:20:31+00:00		caused by:
2024-04-12T01:20:31+00:00		Problem found during product data unit generation -> skipping to the next, if any ...
2024-04-12T01:20:31+00:00	acs::PDUGenerator::exPDUGeneratorException in (0) from  thread "" [139970633246912]

For information PDGSANMO-14095 created

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working CCB Issue for CCB ipf Limitation The issue causes limitations ops Ticket from ADS operation team priority:blocking Set the priority to blocking because the production is blocked S3 Relative to Sentinel-3 RS Addons to_be_fixed_phase1 Issue to be fixed for RS phase 1 WERUM dev Ticket dedicated to WERUM development
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants