Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Load rate structure from a file #12

Closed
christophertull opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Load rate structure from a file #12

christophertull opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@christophertull
Copy link
Member

Users should be able to load a rate structure from a file, either to set the baseline rates or to populate the boxes in the customer class tabs. There should probably be an import button somewhere.

Before this can happen, a format for storing and transmitting rates needs to be devised, which is a problem that I a working on, probably in a different repo.

@patwater
Copy link

Is the idea here that this hard coded global.R file would get pruned down (https://github.com/California-Data-Collaborative/rate-comparison/blob/master/global.R) and then instead the global.R would just pull in the right rate specification file according to the utility name provide: https://github.com/California-Data-Collaborative/Open-Water-Rate-Specification

Down the road if this truly was a standard one might not even need to have the open-water-rate-specification file on one's desktop... Just a well placed web hook or something like that :)

@christophertull
Copy link
Member Author

Oooo, I like the webhook idea! And yeah, that is the general idea here.

Re: issue #11 users should also be able to save a rate structure that they are in the process of designing so that they can come back and load it later.

@christophertull christophertull modified the milestones: Accelerated Deployment Ready for Production, Machine-readable, Shareable Rate Schedules Oct 20, 2016
@christophertull christophertull self-assigned this Nov 28, 2016
@christophertull
Copy link
Member Author

closed by #33

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants