You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Initially reported a month ago by @DaveBowman2001, after #71 was merged. My comments then:
The definition for Huygens with Cassini has FixedRotation { Inclination 90 AscendingNode 90 }
Changing this to 0 or 180 puts Huygens on its side. So rotating it another 90 degrees should fix the orientation, right? No! Values of -90 or 270 result in the original wrong orientation!
Celestia Origin defines Huygens as two separate objects - attached to Cassini, and in free flight - with different Orientation parameters. That may be the only way to make Huygens' orientation always correct, but I really don't want to do that...
Maybe I'll look into this further (along with finally updating asteroids) some time when I'm willing to suffer through trying to get modeled objects' orientations correct. Until then, I'm open to any suggestions. Apparently, the same issue affects Galileo's probe (#76).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
- New ISS model
- Parent bodies of Cassini, Huygens, and Galileo changed to fix shadowing issues
- Orientation of Huygens with Cassini fixed; closes#77
- Orientation and trajectory of Galileo Probe fixed; closes#76
- Data updates for Mars Odyssey and MGS
- New ISS model
- Parent bodies of Cassini, Huygens, and Galileo changed to fix shadowing issues
- Orientation of Huygens with Cassini fixed; closes#77
- Orientation and trajectory of Galileo Probe fixed; closes#76
- Data updates for Mars Odyssey and MGS
Initially reported a month ago by @DaveBowman2001, after #71 was merged. My comments then:
Maybe I'll look into this further (along with finally updating asteroids) some time when I'm willing to suffer through trying to get modeled objects' orientations correct. Until then, I'm open to any suggestions. Apparently, the same issue affects Galileo's probe (#76).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: