Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Install PyYaml alongside beanstalkc #171

Closed
rtnpro opened this issue Feb 22, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Install PyYaml alongside beanstalkc #171

rtnpro opened this issue Feb 22, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@rtnpro
Copy link
Contributor

rtnpro commented Feb 22, 2017

Issue

Currently, we need to pass the data from beanstalk tube by hand. It seems that beanstalkc, can load the values as dict if it has access to the yaml module. This'd ease parsing data from beanstalk.

Fix

Install PyYaml in worker containers.

@navidshaikh navidshaikh self-assigned this Mar 2, 2017
navidshaikh added a commit to navidshaikh/container-pipeline-service that referenced this issue Mar 2, 2017
navidshaikh added a commit to navidshaikh/container-pipeline-service that referenced this issue Mar 2, 2017
navidshaikh added a commit to navidshaikh/container-pipeline-service that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2017
navidshaikh added a commit to navidshaikh/container-pipeline-service that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2017
navidshaikh added a commit to navidshaikh/container-pipeline-service that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2017
navidshaikh added a commit to navidshaikh/container-pipeline-service that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2017
navidshaikh added a commit to navidshaikh/container-pipeline-service that referenced this issue Mar 30, 2017
navidshaikh added a commit to navidshaikh/container-pipeline-service that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2017
rtnpro pushed a commit to rtnpro/container-pipeline-service that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2017
rtnpro pushed a commit to navidshaikh/container-pipeline-service that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2017
@navidshaikh
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed with #185

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants