add shellcheck to CI #1423
add shellcheck to CI #1423
Conversation
LesnyRumcajs
requested review from
ec2,
noot,
connormullett,
elmattic and
lemmih
as code owners
LesnyRumcajs
force-pushed
the
ci-add-shellcheck
branch
from
b2f5cba
to
dc05677
Compare
.github/workflows/shellcheck.yml
Outdated
| steps: | ||
| - name: Checkout | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v2 | ||
| - name: Run shellcheck |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What about adding these two lines to the lint job to reduce complexity in the workflows?
https://github.com/ChainSafe/forest/blob/main/.github/workflows/rust.yml#L100
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was considering this, then I looked at the workflow name and I abandoned this idea - all the jobs inside seem to be strictly related to Rust. On the other hand, if we'd rename it to e.g. Forest CI or some better name, then it would fit nicely the lint job. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree, however, renaming it means we need to mess with all the PRs again. Maybe just keep it in shell.yml for now.
| @@ -76,4 +76,4 @@ for endpoint in ${RPC_ENDPOINTS[@]}; do | |||
| done | |||
|
|
|||
| # Kill forest daemon | |||
| ps -ef | grep forest | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}' | xargs kill | |||
| pgrep forest | xargs kill | |||
.github/workflows/shellcheck.yml
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | |||
| name: ShellCheck | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| name: ShellCheck | |
| name: Shell |
Let's name it also Shell so in case we need to add more later.
Summary of changes
Changes introduced in this pull request: