Rupan/reward actor tests #403
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RajarupanSampanthan
requested review from
ansermino,
austinabell,
dutterbutter and
ec2
as code owners
|
Not sure why test is failing because cargo test passes on my laptop |
Yeah don't worry that's not anything to do with this PR, @ec2 had that on his branch. Just the linker is not working consistently on the CI rn |
austinabell
suggested changes
May 9, 2020
austinabell
approved these changes
May 9, 2020
| ticket_count: 0, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| //Expect call to fail because actor doesnt have enough tokens to reward |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| //Expect call to fail because actor doesnt have enough tokens to reward | |
| // Expect call to fail because actor doesnt have enough tokens to reward |
austinabell
reviewed
May 9, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary of changes
Changes introduced in this pull request:
Reference issue to close (if applicable)
Closes #315
Other information and links
Didn't get to do this but we should probably create a func as a wrapper around call to revert state if call is being used instead of manually fixing state every time.