Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lodecli beacon init / run #842

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
May 6, 2020
Merged

lodecli beacon init / run #842

merged 20 commits into from
May 6, 2020

Conversation

wemeetagain
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@wemeetagain wemeetagain mentioned this pull request Apr 26, 2020
jbrady42
jbrady42 previously approved these changes Apr 27, 2020
Copy link

@jbrady42 jbrady42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.
👍

}

process.on("SIGTERM", cleanup);
process.on("SIGINT", cleanup);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should use https://github.com/jtlapp/node-cleanup/blob/master/node-cleanup.js as it handles all signals and exceptions

@wemeetagain wemeetagain marked this pull request as ready for review April 28, 2020 13:51
@twoeths
Copy link
Contributor

twoeths commented Apr 30, 2020

Looks great. Do we want to start moving some e2e tests to lodecli?

@wemeetagain
Copy link
Member Author

@tuyennhv Yes! I'll add the beacon e2e test. (and update lodecli to include the work in #843)

@wemeetagain
Copy link
Member Author

I added some sanity unit tests, but the beacon node is currently not stable enough to run in a meaningful e2e test. I'll make an issue for this

@wemeetagain wemeetagain merged commit 6b0ca98 into master May 6, 2020
@wemeetagain wemeetagain deleted the lodecli branch May 6, 2020 18:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants