-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Transformation of relative pose to absolute pose #30
Comments
@ChiWeiHsiao @lucleon Hi , I have same questions. |
I have the same problem, and when I evaluate the error of relative pose, the error is very large, but the trajectory fits well. Have you solved it? @fangxu622 @lucleon @ChiWeiHsiao |
KITTI is recorded from the trajectory of a car. This movement does not have pitch and roll. The only angle change is yaw. |
In my opinion,This is due to in test.py,they measure the loss in absolute pose,which is different from training |
It's worked out. This is the absolute pose. It can be solved by processing the pose data in the data set as relative pose.Hope to help you!
…------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "ChiWeiHsiao/DeepVO-pytorch" ***@***.***>;
发送时间: 2022年11月22日(星期二) 上午9:40
***@***.***>;
***@***.******@***.***>;
主题: Re: [ChiWeiHsiao/DeepVO-pytorch] Transformation of relative pose to absolute pose (#30)
I have the same problem, and when I evaluate the error of relative pose, the error is very large, but the trajectory fits well. Have you solved it? @fangxu622 @lucleon @ChiWeiHsiao
In my opinion,This is due to in test.py,they measure the loss in absolute pose,which is different from training
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Thank you for your reply!
…------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "ChiWeiHsiao/DeepVO-pytorch" ***@***.***>;
发送时间: 2022年11月22日(星期二) 上午9:40
***@***.***>;
***@***.******@***.***>;
主题: Re: [ChiWeiHsiao/DeepVO-pytorch] Transformation of relative pose to absolute pose (#30)
I have the same problem, and when I evaluate the error of relative pose, the error is very large, but the trajectory fits well. Have you solved it? @fangxu622 @lucleon @ChiWeiHsiao
In my opinion,This is due to in test.py,they measure the loss in absolute pose,which is different from training
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
In line 94 in test.py, the Rotation Matrix is computed using only one Euler angle:
ang = eulerAnglesToRotationMatrix([0, answer[-1][0], 0])
I'm wondering, why are theta_x and theta_z set to zero?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: