Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve deserialize benchmark #375

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

arvidn
Copy link
Contributor

@arvidn arvidn commented Feb 8, 2024

The test block generator had some garbage appended to it (by mistake). This was removed.
Extend benchmark to also cover compressed blocks (i.e. CLVM backrefs).
Extend benchmark to cover tree_hash_from_stream()

@arvidn arvidn force-pushed the improve-deserialize-benchmark branch from 2d63788 to c43ac62 Compare February 8, 2024 16:35
@arvidn arvidn force-pushed the improve-deserialize-benchmark branch 2 times, most recently from b1b6e5e to 6bf874b Compare February 8, 2024 16:42
Copy link

coveralls-official bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7833002053

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.05%) to 94.193%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7792995744: 0.05%
Covered Lines: 5401
Relevant Lines: 5734

💛 - Coveralls

…. This was removed. Extend benchmark to also cover compressed blocks (i.e. CLVM backrefs). Extend benchmark to cover tree_hash_from_stream()
@arvidn arvidn force-pushed the improve-deserialize-benchmark branch from 6bf874b to 5ef6faf Compare February 8, 2024 16:46
@arvidn arvidn marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2024 17:06
@arvidn arvidn merged commit e3230f3 into main Feb 8, 2024
29 checks passed
@arvidn arvidn deleted the improve-deserialize-benchmark branch February 8, 2024 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants