Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add fuzzer for Allocator #383

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2024
Merged

add fuzzer for Allocator #383

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2024

Conversation

arvidn
Copy link
Contributor

@arvidn arvidn commented Feb 13, 2024

specifically handling of atom(), small_number() and number().

This checks certain properties that we expect to hold for any atom (conditioned on whether it's an canonical form integer or not).

This functions as a property-based test.

Copy link

coveralls-official bot commented Feb 13, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7886095739

Details

  • 0 of 3 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.002%) to 94.337%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7884511248: 0.002%
Covered Lines: 5780
Relevant Lines: 6127

💛 - Coveralls

@arvidn arvidn marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2024 12:06
@arvidn arvidn changed the title add fuzzer for Allocator, add fuzzer for Allocator Feb 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Rigidity Rigidity left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@arvidn arvidn merged commit 04006ec into main Feb 13, 2024
29 checks passed
@arvidn arvidn deleted the allocator-fuzzer branch February 13, 2024 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants