Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Miscellaneous improvements #27

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 30, 2018
Merged

Miscellaneous improvements #27

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 30, 2018

Conversation

winitzki
Copy link
Collaborator

  • overcome the jvm bytecode limit when emitting many lambda-terms
  • fix bug with recognizing Function10[...] in macro
  • reinstate lambda-terms output when using implement

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 30, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #27 into master will increase coverage by 0.65%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #27      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.03%   92.69%   +0.65%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         678      684       +6     
  Branches       59       67       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits          624      634      +10     
+ Misses         54       50       -4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/main/scala/io/chymyst/ch/TheoremProver.scala 96.87% <ø> (+1.56%) ⬆️
src/main/scala/io/chymyst/ch/Macros.scala 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/main/scala/io/chymyst/ch/TermExpr.scala 91.21% <100%> (+0.9%) ⬆️
src/main/scala/io/chymyst/ch/TypeExpr.scala 84.4% <0%> (+0.91%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5597c03...6a9cec7. Read the comment docs.

@winitzki winitzki merged commit 7b00062 into master Mar 30, 2018
@winitzki winitzki deleted the feature/remove-jvm-limit branch March 30, 2018 03:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant