Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add ordering heuristics for conjunctions and disjunctions #9

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 21, 2018

Conversation

winitzki
Copy link
Collaborator

  • heuristics for conjunctions and disjunctions
  • additional tests
  • bug fixes

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #9 into master will decrease coverage by 0.55%.
The diff coverage is 95.18%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #9      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.13%   94.57%   -0.56%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         473      535      +62     
  Branches       32       31       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits          450      506      +56     
- Misses         23       29       +6
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/main/scala/io/chymyst/ch/Macros.scala 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/main/scala/io/chymyst/ch/TheoremProver.scala 96.96% <100%> (-0.18%) ⬇️
src/main/scala/io/chymyst/ch/LJT.scala 97.94% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/main/scala/io/chymyst/ch/TermExpr.scala 91.66% <94.11%> (-0.29%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4eaf62c...85dd201. Read the comment docs.

@winitzki winitzki merged commit 4051c01 into master Jan 21, 2018
@winitzki winitzki deleted the feature/ordering-heuristics branch January 21, 2018 19:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant