Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assorted changes #24

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Dec 18, 2012
Merged

Conversation

iawells
Copy link

@iawells iawells commented Dec 17, 2012

Includes no-net installation for pip

@robertstarmer
Copy link
Contributor

These look good to me, and I tested them previously.

+1

@iawells
Copy link
Author

iawells commented Dec 17, 2012

... You never installed a control or compute node during these tests, I suspect...

@robertstarmer
Copy link
Contributor

I didn't claim that I had. I said they looked good from a purely aesthetic perspective.... The nodes are building as we speak (or not)

@markvoelker
Copy link

It looks as though we've got fixes for a variety of things here...what bugs do these propose to fix?

@robertstarmer
Copy link
Contributor

Works, up to the point of external internet access. quantum starts and runs, bridges are set up, etc.

robertstarmer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2012
@robertstarmer robertstarmer merged commit 4a689cf into CiscoSystems:multi-node Dec 18, 2012
@iawells
Copy link
Author

iawells commented Dec 18, 2012

Cleared the bugs related to this.

@markvoelker
Copy link

@markvoelker
Copy link

Also, who was the second reviewer on this?

@iawells
Copy link
Author

iawells commented Dec 18, 2012

Shweta tested them, I believe.

@ghost ghost assigned shwetaap Dec 18, 2012
@markvoelker
Copy link

Shweta, can you that you've reviewed and tested this please? We really ought not be merging code that hasn't demonstrably been reviewed.

@robertstarmer
Copy link
Contributor

I DID review and test.

On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:14 AM, Mark T. Voelker <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

Shweta, can you that you've reviewed and tested this please? We really ought not be merging code that hasn't demonstrably been reviewed.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/24#issuecomment-11485417.

@markvoelker
Copy link

And that makes one person. Policy says two are necessary before the code gets merged.

@shwetaap
Copy link

I am rebuilding my nodes with the merged changes. With Ians changes, The setup proceeded without any glitches.
I noticed these 2 issues though . I could observe this issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-cisco/folsom/+bug/1086248
and when I opened the nagios application it wasnt listing the control or the compute nodes. Rebuilding the setup to verify if I see these two issues.

@robertstarmer
Copy link
Contributor

Uncle.

On Dec 18, 2012, at 7:54 AM, "Mark T. Voelker" <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com>
wrote:

And that makes one person. Policy says two are necessary before the code gets merged.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/24#issuecomment-11492269.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants