Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

-Wpointer-bool-conversion in drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c #119

Closed
tpimh opened this issue Sep 19, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

-Wpointer-bool-conversion in drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c #119

tpimh opened this issue Sep 19, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@nathanchance
Labels
-Wpointer-bool-conversion [BUG] linux A bug that should be fixed in the mainline kernel. [FIXED][LINUX] 4.20 This bug was fixed in Linux 4.20

Comments

@tpimh
Copy link

tpimh commented Sep 19, 2018 

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of 'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of 'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.
@tpimh tpimh added [BUG] linux A bug that should be fixed in the mainline kernel. low priority This bug is not critical and not a priority labels Sep 19, 2018
@nickdesaulniers nickdesaulniers added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Sep 19, 2018
@nathanchance nathanchance self-assigned this Sep 21, 2018
@nathanchance
Copy link
Member

Patch sent: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180921202130.12480-1-natechancellor@gmail.com/

@nathanchance nathanchance added the [PATCH] Submitted A patch has been submitted for review label Sep 21, 2018
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2018
@nathanchance @intel-lab-lkp
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
724f41b 
Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
@tpimh tpimh removed the good first issue Good for newcomers label Sep 25, 2018
@nathanchance
Copy link
Member

Patch accepted: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/backlight.git/commit/?id=7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c

@nathanchance nathanchance added [PATCH] Accepted A submitted patch has been accepted upstream and removed [PATCH] Submitted A patch has been submitted for review labels Oct 9, 2018
@nathanchance
Copy link
Member

Merged into mainline: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c

@nathanchance nathanchance added [FIXED][LINUX] 4.20 This bug was fixed in Linux 4.20 and removed [PATCH] Accepted A submitted patch has been accepted upstream labels Oct 25, 2018
@tpimh tpimh removed the low priority This bug is not critical and not a priority label Oct 26, 2018
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2019
@hnaz @torvalds
psi: avoid divide-by-zero crash inside virtual machines
4e37504 
We've been seeing hard-to-trigger psi crashes when running inside VM
instances:

    divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
    Modules linked in: [...]
    CPU: 0 PID: 212 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.16.18-119_fbk9_3817_gfe944c98d695 #119
    Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
    Workqueue: events psi_clock
    RIP: 0010:psi_update_stats+0x270/0x490
    RSP: 0018:ffffc90001117e10 EFLAGS: 00010246
    RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff8800a35a13f8
    RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8800a35a1340 RDI: 0000000000000000
    RBP: 0000000000000658 R08: ffff8800a35a1470 R09: 0000000000000000
    R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
    R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000f8502
    FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88023fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
    CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
    CR2: 00007fbe370fa000 CR3: 00000000b1e3a000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
    DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
    DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
    Call Trace:
     psi_clock+0x12/0x50
     process_one_work+0x1e0/0x390
     worker_thread+0x2b/0x3c0
     ? rescuer_thread+0x330/0x330
     kthread+0x113/0x130
     ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
     ? SyS_exit_group+0x10/0x10
     ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
    Code: 48 0f 47 c7 48 01 c2 45 85 e4 48 89 16 0f 85 e6 00 00 00 4c 8b 49 10 4c 8b 51 08 49 69 d9 f2 07 00 00 48 6b c0 64 4c 8b 29 31 d2 <48> f7 f7 49 69 d5 8d 06 00 00 48 89 c5 4c 69 f0 00 98 0b 00 48

The Code-line points to `period` being 0 inside update_stats(), and we
divide by that when calculating that period's pressure percentage.

The elapsed period should never be 0.  The reason this can happen is due
to an off-by-one in the idle time / missing period calculation combined
with a coarse sched_clock() in the virtual machine.

The target time for aggregation is advanced into the future on a fixed
grid to prevent clock drift.  So when an aggregation runs after some idle
period, we can not just set it to "now + psi_period", but have to
calculate the downtime and advance the target time relative to itself.

However, if the aggregator was disabled exactly one psi_period (ns), we
drop one idle period in the calculation due to a > when we should do >=.
In that case, next_update will be advanced from 'now - psi_period' to
'now' when it should be moved to 'now + psi_period'.  The run finishes
with last_update == next_update == sched_clock().

With hardware clocks, this exact nanosecond match isn't likely in the
first place; but if it does happen, the clock will still have moved on and
the period non-zero by the time the worker runs.  A pointlessly short
period, but besides the extra work, no harm no foul.  However, a slow
sched_clock() like we have on VMs might not have advanced either by the
time the worker runs again.  And when we calculate the elapsed period, the
result, our pressure divisor, will be 0.  Ouch.

Fix this by correctly handling the situation when the elapsed time between
aggregation runs is precisely two periods, and advance the expiration
timestamp correctly to period into the future.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214193157.15788-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-by: Łukasz Siudut <lsiudut@fb.com
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2019
@ndreys
dma-mapping: fix false positivse warnings in dma_common_free_remap()
2cf2aa6 
Commit 5cf4537 ("dma-mapping: introduce a dma_common_find_pages
helper") changed invalid input check in dma_common_free_remap() from:

    if (!area || !area->flags != VM_DMA_COHERENT)

to

    if (!area || !area->flags != VM_DMA_COHERENT || !area->pages)

which seem to produce false positives for memory obtained via
dma_common_contiguous_remap()

This triggers the following warning message when doing "reboot" on ZII
VF610 Dev Board Rev B:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/dma/remap.c:112 dma_common_free_remap+0x88/0x8c
trying to free invalid coherent area: 9ef82980
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-next-20190820 #119
Hardware name: Freescale Vybrid VF5xx/VF6xx (Device Tree)
Backtrace:
[<8010d1ec>] (dump_backtrace) from [<8010d588>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
 r7:8015ed78 r6:00000009 r5:00000000 r4:9f4d9b14
[<8010d568>] (show_stack) from [<8077e3f0>] (dump_stack+0x24/0x28)
[<8077e3cc>] (dump_stack) from [<801197a0>] (__warn.part.3+0xcc/0xe4)
[<801196d4>] (__warn.part.3) from [<80119830>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x78/0x94)
 r6:00000070 r5:808e540c r4:81c03048
[<801197bc>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<8015ed78>] (dma_common_free_remap+0x88/0x8c)
 r3:9ef82980 r2:808e53e0
 r7:00001000 r6:a0b1e000 r5:a0b1e000 r4:00001000
[<8015ecf0>] (dma_common_free_remap) from [<8010fa9c>] (remap_allocator_free+0x60/0x68)
 r5:81c03048 r4:9f4d9b78
[<8010fa3c>] (remap_allocator_free) from [<801100d0>] (__arm_dma_free.constprop.3+0xf8/0x148)
 r5:81c03048 r4:9ef82900
[<8010ffd8>] (__arm_dma_free.constprop.3) from [<80110144>] (arm_dma_free+0x24/0x2c)
 r5:9f563410 r4:80110120
[<80110120>] (arm_dma_free) from [<8015d80c>] (dma_free_attrs+0xa0/0xdc)
[<8015d76c>] (dma_free_attrs) from [<8020f3e4>] (dma_pool_destroy+0xc0/0x154)
 r8:9efa8860 r7:808f02f0 r6:808f02d0 r5:9ef82880 r4:9ef82780
[<8020f324>] (dma_pool_destroy) from [<805525d0>] (ehci_mem_cleanup+0x6c/0x150)
 r7:9f563410 r6:9efa8810 r5:00000000 r4:9efd0148
[<80552564>] (ehci_mem_cleanup) from [<80558e0c>] (ehci_stop+0xac/0xc0)
 r5:9efd0148 r4:9efd0000
[<80558d60>] (ehci_stop) from [<8053c4bc>] (usb_remove_hcd+0xf4/0x1b0)
 r7:9f563410 r6:9efd0074 r5:81c03048 r4:9efd0000
[<8053c3c8>] (usb_remove_hcd) from [<8056361c>] (host_stop+0x48/0xb8)
 r7:9f563410 r6:9efd0000 r5:9f5f4040 r4:9f5f5040
[<805635d4>] (host_stop) from [<80563d0c>] (ci_hdrc_host_destroy+0x34/0x38)
 r7:9f563410 r6:9f5f5040 r5:9efa8800 r4:9f5f4040
[<80563cd8>] (ci_hdrc_host_destroy) from [<8055ef18>] (ci_hdrc_remove+0x50/0x10c)
[<8055eec8>] (ci_hdrc_remove) from [<804a2ed8>] (platform_drv_remove+0x34/0x4c)
 r7:9f563410 r6:81c4f99c r5:9efa8810 r4:9efa8810
[<804a2ea4>] (platform_drv_remove) from [<804a18a8>] (device_release_driver_internal+0xec/0x19c)
 r5:00000000 r4:9efa8810
[<804a17bc>] (device_release_driver_internal) from [<804a1978>] (device_release_driver+0x20/0x24)
 r7:9f563410 r6:81c41ed0 r5:9efa8810 r4:9f4a1dac
[<804a1958>] (device_release_driver) from [<804a01b8>] (bus_remove_device+0xdc/0x108)
[<804a00dc>] (bus_remove_device) from [<8049c204>] (device_del+0x150/0x36c)
 r7:9f563410 r6:81c03048 r5:9efa8854 r4:9efa8810
[<8049c0b4>] (device_del) from [<804a3368>] (platform_device_del.part.2+0x20/0x84)
 r10:9f563414 r9:809177e0 r8:81cb07dc r7:81c78320 r6:9f563454 r5:9efa8800
 r4:9efa8800
[<804a3348>] (platform_device_del.part.2) from [<804a3420>] (platform_device_unregister+0x28/0x34)
 r5:9f563400 r4:9efa8800
[<804a33f8>] (platform_device_unregister) from [<8055dce0>] (ci_hdrc_remove_device+0x1c/0x30)
 r5:9f563400 r4:00000001
[<8055dcc4>] (ci_hdrc_remove_device) from [<805652ac>] (ci_hdrc_imx_remove+0x38/0x118)
 r7:81c78320 r6:9f563454 r5:9f563410 r4:9f541010
[<8056538c>] (ci_hdrc_imx_shutdown) from [<804a2970>] (platform_drv_shutdown+0x2c/0x30)
[<804a2944>] (platform_drv_shutdown) from [<8049e4fc>] (device_shutdown+0x158/0x1f0)
[<8049e3a4>] (device_shutdown) from [<8013ac80>] (kernel_restart_prepare+0x44/0x48)
 r10:00000058 r9:9f4d8000 r8:fee1dead r7:379ce700 r6:81c0b280 r5:81c03048
 r4:00000000
[<8013ac3c>] (kernel_restart_prepare) from [<8013ad14>] (kernel_restart+0x1c/0x60)
[<8013acf8>] (kernel_restart) from [<8013af84>] (__do_sys_reboot+0xe0/0x1d8)
 r5:81c03048 r4:00000000
[<8013aea4>] (__do_sys_reboot) from [<8013b0ec>] (sys_reboot+0x18/0x1c)
 r8:80101204 r7:00000058 r6:00000000 r5:00000000 r4:00000000
[<8013b0d4>] (sys_reboot) from [<80101000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54)
Exception stack(0x9f4d9fa8 to 0x9f4d9ff0)
9fa0:                   00000000 00000000 fee1dead 28121969 01234567 379ce700
9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000058 00000000 00000000 00000000 00016d04
9fe0: 00028e0c 7ec87c64 000135ec 76c1f410

Restore original invalid input check in dma_common_free_remap() to
avoid this problem.

Fixes: 5cf4537 ("dma-mapping: introduce a dma_common_find_pages helper")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
[hch: just revert the offending hunk instead of creating a new helper]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
najahiiii pushed a commit to chips-project/kernel_asus_sdm660 that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2019
@nathanchance @gregkh
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
4ce2411 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
woodsts pushed a commit to woodsts/linux-stable that referenced this issue Nov 24, 2019
@nathanchance @gregkh
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
b0c6a78 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645 ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
woodsts pushed a commit to woodsts/linux-stable that referenced this issue Nov 24, 2019
@nathanchance @gregkh
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
0f07c78 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645 ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
isjerryxiao pushed a commit to isjerryxiao/Amlogic_s905-kernel that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2019
@nathanchance @isjerryxiao
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
d741452 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645 ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Whissi pushed a commit to Whissi/linux-stable that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2019
@nathanchance @gregkh
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
1a10300 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645 ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2019
@nathanchance @gregkh
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
053d927 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645 ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2019
@nathanchance @gregkh
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
175c50e 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645 ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2019
@nathanchance @gregkh
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
066a176 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645 ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
najahiiii pushed a commit to chips-project/kernel_asus_sdm660 that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2019
@nathanchance @gregkh
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
af0ca16 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Whissi pushed a commit to Whissi/linux-stable that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2019
@nathanchance @gregkh
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
4e132c7 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645 ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
SyberHexen pushed a commit to SyberHexen/android_kernel_motorola_sdm632 that referenced this issue Nov 26, 2019
@nathanchance @SyberHexen
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
54f4072 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645 ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sergoops pushed a commit to sergoops/kernel_realme_sm6150 that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2021
@nathanchance @sergoops
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
0ede1ce 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
TenSeventy7 pushed a commit to FreshROMs/android_kernel_samsung_exynos9610_mint that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2021
@nathanchance @TenSeventy7
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
658360b 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
turex pushed a commit to turex/siberia_hi6250_kernel that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2021
@nathanchance @turex
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
1440faf 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
krazey pushed a commit to krazey/android_kernel_motorola_exynos9610 that referenced this issue May 3, 2022
@nathanchance @krazey
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
bc65147 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
krazey pushed a commit to krazey/android_kernel_motorola_exynos9610 that referenced this issue May 4, 2022
@nathanchance @krazey
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
b967093 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
much-doge pushed a commit to much-doge/Quantum_Quackery that referenced this issue Jun 18, 2022
@nathanchance @much-doge
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
85bbb3c 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
much-doge pushed a commit to much-doge/Quantum_Quackery that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2022
@nathanchance @much-doge
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
ee40e8c 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ghenrique737 pushed a commit to ghenrique737/android_kernel_samsung_sdm845 that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2022
@nathanchance @ghenrique737
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
3480237 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
blueseaxy pushed a commit to blueseaxy/android_kernel_xiaomi_garden that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2023
@nathanchance @blueseaxy
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
1943cec 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Meghthedev pushed a commit to SamsungM30s/android_kernel_samsung_m30s that referenced this issue May 9, 2023
@nathanchance @Meghthedev
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
39de94d 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Gnathvm pushed a commit to Gnathvm/android_kernel_amlogic that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2023
@nathanchance @Gnathvm
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
5a1402f 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645 ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Meghthedev pushed a commit to Meghthedev/kernel_samsung_m30s that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2023
@nathanchance @Meghthedev
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
15eef24 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Meghthedev pushed a commit to Meghthedev/kernel_samsung_m30s that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2023
@nathanchance @Meghthedev
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
f37631b 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Meghthedev pushed a commit to Meghthedev/kernel_samsung_m30s that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2023
@nathanchance @Meghthedev
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
5b497d7 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mdsumon2001 pushed a commit to mdsumon2001/kernel_realme_RMX3061 that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2023
@nathanchance @mdsumon2001
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
389d984 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumon Ali <mdsumonali751@gmail.com>
Gojikovi pushed a commit to Gojikovi/kernel_samsung_universal9611 that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2023
@nathanchance @Gojikovi
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
ca4d057 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
LMAO-armv8 pushed a commit to LMAO-armv8/kernel_samsung_m31 that referenced this issue Nov 17, 2023
@nathanchance @LMAO-armv8
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
1bb9f2e 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Coconutat pushed a commit to Coconutat/android_kernel_xiaomi_sdm845_byd_exp that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2023
@nathanchance @Coconutat
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
faeab66 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Coconutat pushed a commit to Coconutat/android_kernel_xiaomi_sdm845_byd_exp that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2023
@nathanchance @Coconutat
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
299419e 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kevios12 pushed a commit to kevios12/android_kernel_samsung_universal7885 that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2024
@nathanchance @kevios12
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
9eec39c 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
FlorinelulX pushed a commit to FlorinelulX/android_kernel_huawei_hi6250-8 that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2024
@nathanchance
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
cf8f778 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
hsyncvlk23 pushed a commit to hsyncvlk23/android_kernel-4.9 that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2024
@nathanchance @hsyncvlk23
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
f7dabcd 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
LinuxGuy312 pushed a commit to LinuxGuy312/android_kernel_realme_RMX1805 that referenced this issue Mar 23, 2024
@nathanchance @LinuxGuy312
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
be0a487 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
svoboda18 pushed a commit to svoboda18/android_blackghost_kernel that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2024
@nathanchance @svoboda18
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
cc8dea0 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Huawei-Dev pushed a commit to Huawei-Dev/android_kernel_huawei_hi3660 that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2024
@nathanchance @Huawei-Dev
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
ec79143 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Huawei-Dev pushed a commit to Huawei-Dev/android_kernel_huawei_hi3660 that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2024
@nathanchance @Huawei-Dev
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
5de4ee6 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Huawei-Dev pushed a commit to Huawei-Dev/android_kernel_huawei_hi3660 that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2024
@nathanchance @Huawei-Dev
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
d21b056 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Huawei-Dev pushed a commit to Huawei-Dev/android_kernel_huawei_hi3660 that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2024
@nathanchance @Huawei-Dev
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
144780a 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Huawei-Dev pushed a commit to Huawei-Dev/android_kernel_huawei_hi3660 that referenced this issue May 19, 2024
@nathanchance @Huawei-Dev
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
e835d53 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Hussein995 pushed a commit to Hussein995/N975F that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2024
@nathanchance @Hussein995
backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister
573450d 
[ Upstream commit 7cea645ae9c5a54aa7904fddb2cdf250acd63a6c ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d5119 ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#119
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nathanchance nathanchance

Labels
-Wpointer-bool-conversion [BUG] linux A bug that should be fixed in the mainline kernel. [FIXED][LINUX] 4.20 This bug was fixed in Linux 4.20
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@tpimh @nickdesaulniers @nathanchance