CFI violation in drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c #1343
Assignees
Labels
[BUG] linux
A bug that should be fixed in the mainline kernel.
[FEATURE] CFI
Related to building the kernel with Clang Control Flow Integrity
[FIXED][LINUX] 5.13
This bug was fixed in Linux 5.13
Comments
nathanchance
added
[BUG] linux
|
Patch accepted: https://git.kernel.org/rafael/linux-pm/c/2bc6262c6117 |
nathanchance
added
[PATCH] Accepted
|
Merged into mainline: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/2bc6262c6117 |
nathanchance
added
[FIXED][LINUX] 5.13
nareshkamboju
pushed a commit
to nareshkamboju/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
nareshkamboju
pushed a commit
to nareshkamboju/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp
pushed a commit
to mrchapp/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp
pushed a commit
to mrchapp/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Whissi
pushed a commit
to Whissi/linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
May 14, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Whissi
pushed a commit
to Whissi/linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
May 14, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Whissi
pushed a commit
to Whissi/linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
May 14, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Whissi
pushed a commit
to Whissi/linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
May 14, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
xanmod
pushed a commit
to xanmod/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kaixuxiakx
pushed a commit
to Tencent/TencentOS-kernel
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998ea44b ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp
pushed a commit
to mrchapp/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp
pushed a commit
to mrchapp/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp
pushed a commit
to mrchapp/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 18, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp
pushed a commit
to mrchapp/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 18, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kaixuxiakx
pushed a commit
to Tencent/TencentOS-kernel
that referenced
this issue
May 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998ea44b ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp
pushed a commit
to mrchapp/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Whissi
pushed a commit
to Whissi/linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
woodsts
pushed a commit
to woodsts/linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
miraclestars
pushed a commit
to miraclestars/android_kernel_samsung_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998ea44b ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kartikbhalla12
pushed a commit
to kartikbhalla12/HyperX-X2
that referenced
this issue
Jun 9, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kartikbhalla12
pushed a commit
to kartikbhalla12/HyperX-X2
that referenced
this issue
Jun 9, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
miraclestars
pushed a commit
to miraclestars/android_kernel_samsung_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jun 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998ea44b ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
acoffeerunner
pushed a commit
to acoffeerunner/kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
jpuhlman
pushed a commit
to MontaVista-OpenSourceTechnology/linux-mvista
that referenced
this issue
Jun 23, 2021
Source: Kernel.org MR: 111111 Type: Integration Disposition: Backport from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable linux-5.4.y ChangeID: 32f5f51a3703995d6d6ccbbde9a8331cb067665e Description: [ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@mvista.com>
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
to delphix/linux-kernel-gcp
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2021
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929615 [ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
it-is-a-robot
pushed a commit
to openeuler-mirror/kernel
that referenced
this issue
Jun 28, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
it-is-a-robot
pushed a commit
to openeuler-mirror/kernel
that referenced
this issue
Jul 1, 2021
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.191 commit 443a6fdcd74be7c023e48c8fd5b589a661de7fe3 -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
vinzv
pushed a commit
to tuxedocomputers/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2021
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930766 [ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
VyattaInternal
pushed a commit
to danos/linux-vyatta
that referenced
this issue
Jul 27, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
VyattaInternal
pushed a commit
to danos/linux-vyatta
that referenced
this issue
Jul 27, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gregmarsden
pushed a commit
to oracle/linux-uek
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit d73b83efe2f36dc98cd85e06f6e5c0afb7a9b61f)
sergoops
pushed a commit
to sergoops/kernel_realme_sm6150
that referenced
this issue
Sep 1, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
SGCMarkus
pushed a commit
to SGCMarkus/android_kernel_lge_sm8150
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
chandu078
pushed a commit
to Havoc-Devices/kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jan 5, 2022
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
taalojarvi
pushed a commit
to Stratosphere-Kernel/android_kernel_xiaomi_surya
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2022
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
venoomdev
pushed a commit
to venoomdev/xiaomi_surya
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2022
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
krazey
pushed a commit
to krazey/android_kernel_motorola_exynos9610
that referenced
this issue
May 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
anht3889
pushed a commit
to anht3889/android_kernel_lge_sm8150
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2022
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
armdebug
pushed a commit
to armdebug/kernel_xiaomi_raphael
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
randomhydrosol
pushed a commit
to GlassROM-devices/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8150
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2022
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: randomhydrosol <randomhydrosol@glassrom.org>
Blackmanx
pushed a commit
to Blackmanx/bigshot_kernel_realme_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Dec 21, 2022
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Rem01Gaming
pushed a commit
to Rem01Gaming/liquid_kernel_realme_even
that referenced
this issue
May 18, 2023
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Rem01Gaming
pushed a commit
to Rem01Gaming/viviz_kernel_even
that referenced
this issue
Jun 20, 2023
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ratatouille100
pushed a commit
to ratatouille100/kernel_samsung_universal9611
that referenced
this issue
Dec 18, 2023
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
zetaxbyte
pushed a commit
to zetaxbyte/kernel_realme_r5x_cos-KSU
that referenced
this issue
Dec 30, 2023
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998ea44b ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
backslashxx
pushed a commit
to backslashxx/android_karnol_ximi_fog
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2024
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Notganesh
pushed a commit
to Notganesh/kernel_oneplus_ivan-R
that referenced
this issue
Mar 21, 2024
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
RiskyGUY22
pushed a commit
to samsungexynos850/KawaKernel-A217X
that referenced
this issue
Apr 7, 2024
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ExtremeXT
pushed a commit
to ExtremeXT/android_kernel_samsung_exynos990
that referenced
this issue
Apr 23, 2024
[ Upstream commit 2bc6262c6117dd18106d5aa50d53e945b5d99c51 ] All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998ea44b ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Patch submitted: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210407213048.940498-1-nathan@kernel.org/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: