invalid operand for instruction cmpli
#1419
Assignees
Labels
[ARCH] powerpc
This bug impacts ARCH=powerpc
[BUG] linux
A bug that should be fixed in the mainline kernel.
[FIXED][LINUX] 5.16
This bug was fixed in Linux 5.16
[TOOL] integrated-as
The issue is relevant to LLVM integrated assembler
Comments
nickdesaulniers
added
[BUG] Untriaged
|
Yeah. Looks like gas will accept an implied L=0 when building in 32-bit mode. I do see some mention of a three-argument version in some old docs, but that's for omitting the CR field, not the L field. Sent a kernel patch for it: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au/T/#u |
nickdesaulniers
added
[PATCH] Submitted
|
Thank you for the patch and adding the URL here. Maybe you could also add the URL of the GitHub issue to the commit message.
|
ruscur
pushed a commit
to ruscur/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2021
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
|
Fix is now in my next branch. |
nickdesaulniers
added
[PATCH] Accepted
nickdesaulniers
added
[FIXED][LINUX] 5.16
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
SonicBSV
pushed a commit
to SonicBSV/android_kernel_asus_sdm660
that referenced
this issue
Aug 23, 2022
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
krazey
pushed a commit
to ExyBrick/android_kernel_samsung_universal9810
that referenced
this issue
Sep 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
garry-rogov
pushed a commit
to garry-rogov/android_kernel_xiaomi_ginkgo
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
fakemanoan
pushed a commit
to fakemanoan/android_kernel_samsung_universal7420
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2022
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
nvidia-bfigg
pushed a commit
to NVIDIA-BaseOS-6/linux-nvidia-5.19
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2022
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952579 [ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
iqba78
pushed a commit
to iqba78/android_kernel_xiaomi_sdm660_southwest
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2022
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
much-doge
pushed a commit
to much-doge/Quantum_Quackery
that referenced
this issue
Dec 30, 2022
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Rohail33
pushed a commit
to Rohail33/Realking_xiaomi_xaga
that referenced
this issue
Dec 31, 2022
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Wrdn28
pushed a commit
to Wrdn28/X01AD_Kernel
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Rem01Gaming
pushed a commit
to Rem01Gaming/liquid_kernel_realme_even
that referenced
this issue
May 21, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
JoysKo
pushed a commit
to JoysKo/HYBRID_CAF_kernel
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
JoysKo
pushed a commit
to JoysKo/HYBRID_CAF_kernel
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
intersectRaven
pushed a commit
to intersectRaven/rk356x-kernel
that referenced
this issue
Sep 16, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ishugrapher
pushed a commit
to ishugrapher/kernel_realme_RMX3031
that referenced
this issue
Sep 18, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
improbir
pushed a commit
to improbir/kernel_realme_sdm710
that referenced
this issue
Sep 18, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
zahid5656
pushed a commit
to zahid5656/android_kernel_realme_sm8150
that referenced
this issue
Nov 12, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mylove90
pushed a commit
to mylove90/pc_ginkgo
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mylove90
pushed a commit
to mylove90/pc_ginkgo
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ratatouille100
pushed a commit
to ratatouille100/kernel_samsung_universal9611
that referenced
this issue
Dec 18, 2023
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
roniwae
pushed a commit
to roniwae/reloaded
that referenced
this issue
Jan 1, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Dheeraj3031A
pushed a commit
to Dheeraj3031A/kernel_oplus_RMX3461
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
backslashxx
pushed a commit
to backslashxx/android_karnol_ximi_fog
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kevios12
pushed a commit
to kevios12/android_kernel_samsung_universal7885
that referenced
this issue
Feb 16, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
RT1648
pushed a commit
to RT1648/android_kernel_asus_sdm660
that referenced
this issue
Feb 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
RT1648
pushed a commit
to RT1648/android_kernel_asus_sdm660
that referenced
this issue
Feb 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
RT1648
pushed a commit
to RT1648/android_kernel_asus_sdm660
that referenced
this issue
Feb 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
FlorinelulX
pushed a commit
to FlorinelulX/android_kernel_huawei_hi6250-8
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kevios12
pushed a commit
to kevios12/android_kernel_samsung_universal7885
that referenced
this issue
Feb 24, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Notganesh
pushed a commit
to Notganesh/kernel_oneplus_ivan-R
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Huawei-Dev
pushed a commit
to Huawei-Dev/android_kernel_huawei_hi3660
that referenced
this issue
Apr 13, 2024
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ]
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four
arguments as defined in the ISA:
cmpli cr0,r3,1024
This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core
User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due
to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four
arguments and recommends using cmplwi.
It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L
field there, a reserved bit instead.
dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when
DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the
generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected.
Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for
32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ...
^
Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when
reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means
the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely).
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
working around #675
It looks like the diagnostic is referring to the
cmpliinstructions.I think
cmplishould have 4 operands, not 3?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: