forked from torvalds/linux
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
-Wmissing-braces in drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c #455
Labels
-Wmissing-braces
[BUG] linux-next
This is an issue only seen in linux-next
[FIXED][LINUX] development cycle
This bug was only present and fixed in a -next or -rc cycle
Comments
nathanchance
added
[PATCH] Submitted
A patch has been submitted for review
-Wmissing-braces
[BUG] linux-next
This is an issue only seen in linux-next
labels
Apr 24, 2019
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this issue
Apr 25, 2019
Clang warns: drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:96:38: warning: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Wmissing-braces] struct resource resources[2] = {0}; ^ {} drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:314:38: warning: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Wmissing-braces] struct resource resources[2] = {0}; ^ {} 2 warnings generated. One way to fix these warnings is to add additional braces like Clang suggests; however, there has been a bit of push back from some maintainers, who just prefer memset as it is unambiguous, doesn't depend on a particular compiler version, and properly initializes all subobjects [1][2]. Do that here so there are no more warnings. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/022e41c0-8465-dc7a-a45c-64187ecd9684@amd.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181128.215241.702406654469517539.davem@davemloft.net/ Link: ClangBuiltLinux#455 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this issue
Apr 25, 2019
Clang warns: drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:96:38: warning: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Wmissing-braces] struct resource resources[2] = {0}; ^ {} drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:314:38: warning: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Wmissing-braces] struct resource resources[2] = {0}; ^ {} 2 warnings generated. One way to fix these warnings is to add additional braces like Clang suggests; however, there has been a bit of push back from some maintainers, who just prefer memset as it is unambiguous, doesn't depend on a particular compiler version, and properly initializes all subobjects [1][2]. Do that here so there are no more warnings. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/022e41c0-8465-dc7a-a45c-64187ecd9684@amd.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181128.215241.702406654469517539.davem@davemloft.net/ Link: ClangBuiltLinux#455 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
nathanchance
added
[PATCH] Accepted
A submitted patch has been accepted upstream
and removed
[PATCH] Submitted
A patch has been submitted for review
labels
Apr 25, 2019
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this issue
Apr 26, 2019
Clang warns: drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:96:38: warning: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Wmissing-braces] struct resource resources[2] = {0}; ^ {} drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:314:38: warning: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Wmissing-braces] struct resource resources[2] = {0}; ^ {} 2 warnings generated. One way to fix these warnings is to add additional braces like Clang suggests; however, there has been a bit of push back from some maintainers, who just prefer memset as it is unambiguous, doesn't depend on a particular compiler version, and properly initializes all subobjects [1][2]. Do that here so there are no more warnings. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/022e41c0-8465-dc7a-a45c-64187ecd9684@amd.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181128.215241.702406654469517539.davem@davemloft.net/ Link: ClangBuiltLinux#455 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
nathanchance
added
[FIXED][LINUX] development cycle
This bug was only present and fixed in a -next or -rc cycle
and removed
[PATCH] Accepted
A submitted patch has been accepted upstream
labels
Apr 26, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
-Wmissing-braces
[BUG] linux-next
This is an issue only seen in linux-next
[FIXED][LINUX] development cycle
This bug was only present and fixed in a -next or -rc cycle
Patch sent: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190424185742.7797-1-natechancellor@gmail.com/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: