Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Original Theme for 2019 (and 2018) #171

Closed
jeffmcneill opened this issue Dec 14, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Original Theme for 2019 (and 2018) #171

jeffmcneill opened this issue Dec 14, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@jeffmcneill
Copy link

WordPress traditionally has a new yearly theme named by year. Currently ClassicPress is shipping with 2015, 2016, and 2017. That's fine, but it does seem to give the impression that the release is old (no 2018, and no 2019). It may be an interesting differentiator to have yearly themes, but named not by year but something else. One random idea is to name the theme by the Chinese Animal for the given year. This year and next year would be "Year of the Dog" (2018), and "Year of the Pig" (2019). Of course Pig might not sound sexy, but it could be "Year of the Boar" with a wild boar-like creature. The idea here really only has to do with naming differently, and also ensuring there is some new free theme that is moderately interesting for people to play with as a default, included option.

@ginsterbusch
Copy link

AFAIK discussion is going on about removing all these "numbered" themes and replacing them with a decent default one, eg. Susty. Others just point out adding a default theme and leave the numbers in ..

I'd suggest posting this issue in CP slack in #themes or #core, and get a healthy discussion going on ;)

cu, w0lf

@nylen
Copy link
Contributor

nylen commented Jan 8, 2019

See also #260.

@nylen nylen added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jan 8, 2019
@zulfgani
Copy link

zulfgani commented Mar 5, 2019

What are your thoughts on a streamlined version of StoreFront without the WC bloat as a starting point. Or has it been settled that Susty is the way forward?

@nylen
Copy link
Contributor

nylen commented Mar 6, 2019

@zulfgani this has not been settled yet, we're just using Susty as the base for our internal sites and we're pretty happy with it there.

As we've been discussing on Slack, I've set up a repository for a fork of Storefront: https://github.com/ClassicPress-research/classicpress-storefront

@viktorix
Copy link
Member

A default theme is in the works, won't be numbered.

@viktorix viktorix transferred this issue from ClassicPress/ClassicPress Nov 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants