We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the unexpected behaviour
Currently, it's not possible to pass an table engine name as a query parameter:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS {table:Identifier} ( key String , value String , expiration DateTime ) ENGINE={engine:Identifier}
It's not correctly handled in the parser and results in Unknown table engine . (UNKNOWN_STORAGE) error. (empty engine name)
Unknown table engine . (UNKNOWN_STORAGE)
How to reproduce
24.2.1.174
Expected behavior
ENGINE={engine:Identifier} is substituted before the table engine parse.
ENGINE={engine:Identifier}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it is not worth it.
Sorry, something went wrong.
More than 1 developer requesting it, maybe you need to reconsider.
Since the current solution is to use "string replacement", it is opening the door for SQL Injection.
I think using engine identifier could save us since it can be sanitized
No branches or pull requests
Describe the unexpected behaviour
Currently, it's not possible to pass an table engine name as a query parameter:
It's not correctly handled in the parser and results in
Unknown table engine . (UNKNOWN_STORAGE)
error. (empty engine name)How to reproduce
24.2.1.174
Expected behavior
ENGINE={engine:Identifier}
is substituted before the table engine parse.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: