Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add output prefix #113

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 16, 2020
Merged

Add output prefix #113

merged 7 commits into from
Oct 16, 2020

Conversation

talnor
Copy link
Contributor

@talnor talnor commented Oct 14, 2020

Description

The features of this PR primarily concerns internals

Summary of the changes made:

  • Output files for delivery are named with sample ID
  • Paths in deliverables file updated and changed accordingly

If not self-evident, mention what prompted the change.

  • Files in housekeeper need unique names

Primary function of PR

  • Hotfix
  • Patch
  • Minor functionality improvement
  • New type of analysis
  • Backward-breaking functionality improvement
  • This change requires internal documents to be updated
  • This change requires another repository to be updated

Testing

If the update is a hotfix, it is sufficient to rely on the development testing along with the Travis self-test automatically applied to the PR.

Test routine to verify the stability of the PR:

  • bash /home/proj/production/servers/resources/hasta.scilifelab.se/update-microsalt-stage.sh add_output_prefix

  • us

  • source activate S_microSALT

  • microSALT analyse /home/proj/stage/microbial/queries/ACC5551.json --input /home/proj/stage/microbial/fastq/ACC5551

  • microSALT analyse /home/proj/stage/microbial/queries/ACC5551A1.json --input /home/proj/stage/microbial/fastq/ACC5551/ACC5551A1

  • Ensure there are no errors when running the analysis

  • Verify that all files specified in the deliverables file exist

Test results

Paths in deliverables files exists and contain sample ID.
No unexpected errors

Exceptions are samples that (as expected) failed the analysis, i.e. NTC and low quality samples. Is missing data handled at a later step as for MIP?

Sign-offs

@talnor talnor requested a review from sylvinite October 16, 2020 11:12
@talnor
Copy link
Contributor Author

talnor commented Oct 16, 2020

Results of testing PR:

Paths in deliverables files exists and contain sample ID.
No unexpected errors

Exceptions are samples that (as expected) failed the analysis, i.e. NTC and low quality samples. Is missing data handled at a later step as for MIP?

@sylvinite sylvinite merged commit 471a2e6 into master Oct 16, 2020
@sylvinite sylvinite deleted the add_output_prefix branch October 27, 2020 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants