Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: ignore non-existent worlds when choosing a free sign #1371

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

schucko1337
Copy link
Member

Motivation

If multiple tasks are in the same group and the tasks use different world names, it is possible that the CloudSigns module selects signs that do not exist, therefore the services are never displayed. This PR ignores all signs that do not exist on the server.

Modification

Signs in unknown worlds are skipped.
Another "cleanupall" option has been added to the cloud signs command, which behaves like the old "cleanup".
The old "cleanup" option has been extended by an additional optional argument "world", which specifies the world in which the cleanup should take place.

Result

Only characters in existing worlds are considered.

Other context

https://discord.com/channels/325362837184577536/818777626663321671/1215677639709425756

@schucko1337 schucko1337 requested a review from 0utplay March 8, 2024 17:49
@schucko1337 schucko1337 added the in: module An issue/pull request releated to one of the internal modules label Mar 8, 2024
@0utplay 0utplay added v: 4.X This pull should be included in the 4.0 release t: improvement The pull request improves existing code labels Mar 8, 2024
@0utplay 0utplay added this to the 4.0.0-RC10 milestone Mar 8, 2024
@0utplay 0utplay added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into CloudNetService:nightly with commit 89cbd29 Mar 8, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: module An issue/pull request releated to one of the internal modules t: improvement The pull request improves existing code v: 4.X This pull should be included in the 4.0 release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants