feat: Add option to enable logging on state machine

[pharindoko]

closes #148

[kichik]

I feel like it would be nicer if it shared the same logging style of other parts of the system. Other parts create the log stream for you and just request the retention period. Is there an importance here to using an existing log group?

[pharindoko]

fine :)
applying the same style as for all other parts definitely makes sense ...

[kichik]

If we can get the log group name into the status function too, even better.

[kichik]

Thanks! Did the status function not work out? Does it have no possible access to this log stream to display it?

[pharindoko]

@kichik
should I add unittests or is it ok like this ?

[kichik]

@kichik should I add unittests or is it ok like this ?

Yeah ideally let's add some unit tests as this is not covered by the integration tests. Just something basic that makes sure the log group is included in the step function definition.

Also, I'm sorry I missed it before, but other code doesn't let the user choose the log name. Unless there is a specific requirement for this here, let's remove that option.

[kichik]

Thanks!