Use LLONG_MAX instead of LONG_LONG_MAX
#1062
Merged
+2
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It says in `limit.h` that you should use `LLONG_MAX` instead of `LONG_LONG_MAX`. /* LONG_LONG_MIN/LONG_LONG_MAX/ULONG_LONG_MAX are a GNU extension. It's too bad that we don't have something like #pragma poison that could be used to deprecate a macro - the code should just use LLONG_MAX and friends. */
Generated by 🚫 Danger |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1062 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 38.94% 38.94%
=======================================
Files 27 27
Lines 4018 4018
=======================================
Hits 1565 1565
Misses 2453 2453
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New Pull Request Checklist
I have read and understood the CONTRIBUTING guide
I have read the Documentation
I have searched for a similar pull request in the project and found none
I have updated this branch with the latest master to avoid conflicts (via merge from master or rebase)
I have added the required tests to prove the fix/feature I am adding
I have updated the documentation (if necessary)
I have run the tests and they pass
I have run the lint and it passes (
pod lib lint)This merge request fixes / refers to the following issues: #1061
Pull Request Description
Use
LLONG_MAXinstead ofLONG_LONG_MAX.It says in
limit.hthat you should useLLONG_MAXinstead ofLONG_LONG_MAX./* LONG_LONG_MIN/LONG_LONG_MAX/ULONG_LONG_MAX are a GNU extension. It's too bad
that we don't have something like #pragma poison that could be used to
deprecate a macro - the code should just use LLONG_MAX and friends.
*/