You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is due to two bugs. The first is due to the following:
When traversing documents at the token level, occasionally we link to the type instead of the constructor.
For example retrieving the symbol for an ObjectExpressionSyntax like: new JQuerySelector(selector, context, jQueryVariable)
will work correctly.
However, as we work with individual tokens, we're retrieving the symbol for the IdentifierSyntax: JQuerySelector
which will provide a symbol that refers to the type instead of the constructor.
So in theory we should be linked to the JQuerySelector type.
We're not because of a second bug that is closely related to #57. We're not handling parameters correctly when they appear in method declarations. I'll reopen #57 and provide an explanation there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Working at the token level has created some issues relating to constructors not linking correctly.
For example: http://sourcebrowser.io/Browse/RaYell/selenium-webdriver-extensions/src/Selenium.WebDriver.Extensions/By.cs#27
The constructor links incorrectly to: http://sourcebrowser.io/Browse/RaYell/selenium-webdriver-extensions/test/Selenium.WebDriver.Extensions.Tests/JQuerySelectorTests.cs#124
This is due to two bugs. The first is due to the following:
When traversing documents at the token level, occasionally we link to the type instead of the constructor.
For example retrieving the symbol for an ObjectExpressionSyntax like:
new JQuerySelector(selector, context, jQueryVariable)
will work correctly.
However, as we work with individual tokens, we're retrieving the symbol for the IdentifierSyntax:
JQuerySelector
which will provide a symbol that refers to the type instead of the constructor.
So in theory we should be linked to the JQuerySelector type.
We're not because of a second bug that is closely related to #57. We're not handling parameters correctly when they appear in method declarations. I'll reopen #57 and provide an explanation there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: