Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

delete "Preparing review..." comment #1

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Jul 6, 2023

Remove the temporary "Preparing review..." comment once we done generating the actual output

@mrT23 mrT23 requested review from okotek and hussam789 July 6, 2023 05:46
@okotek okotek merged commit 70b7ace into main Jul 6, 2023
@okotek okotek deleted the feature/delete_initial_comment branch July 6, 2023 07:07
@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Removing temporary comments from PRs
  • 🔍 Description and title: Yes
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • Minimal and focused: Yes

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General PR suggestions: The PR is well-structured and follows good practices. However, it would be beneficial to add tests for the new functionality to ensure it works as expected and does not introduce regressions.

  • 🤖 Code suggestions:

  • suggestion 1:

    • relevant file: github_provider.py
    • suggestion content: Consider using a separate method to handle the creation and addition of comments to the 'comments_list' attribute. This would improve the readability and maintainability of the code. [medium]
  • suggestion 2:

    • relevant file: github_provider.py
    • suggestion content: In the 'remove_initial_comment' method, it would be better to log the exception message instead of the entire exception object. This would make the logs cleaner and easier to read. [medium]
  • suggestion 3:

    • relevant file: pr_questions.py
    • suggestion content: Consider adding error handling for the 'remove_initial_comment' method call. If it fails, the program should not crash and should continue to function as expected. [important]
  • suggestion 4:

    • relevant file: pr_reviewer.py
    • suggestion content: Similar to the previous suggestion, consider adding error handling for the 'remove_initial_comment' method call in this file as well. [important]
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No

Add a comment that says 'Please review' to ask for a new review after you update the PR.
Add a comment that says 'Please answer <QUESTION...>' to ask a question about this PR.

@Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from CodiumAI-Agent Jul 6, 2023
@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

Questions: Write a poem about this PR

Answer: In the land of code, where logic thrives,
A PR emerges, as the coder strives.
"Delete 'Preparing review...' comment," it reads,
A feature branch, where the change leads.

A logging import, the tale begins,
A tale of code, of losses and wins.
A function tweaked, a comment made,
In the realm of Github, where bytes are laid.

A try-catch block, a new function born,
To remove initial comments, no longer forlorn.
An error caught, a message logged,
Through the maze of code, the PR has jogged.

A token required, a link provided,
In the README, the changes guided.
A few lines removed, a few lines added,
In the dance of code, the PR padded.

So here's to the PR, a change so neat,
In the world of code, a feat so sweet.
A temporary comment, no longer in sight,
In the realm of Github, it's a coder's delight.

As for the PR code review:

  1. The addition of the is_temporary flag in the publish_comment method is a good way to distinguish between temporary and permanent comments. This makes it easier to delete the temporary comments later.

  2. The remove_initial_comment method is well-implemented with a try-except block to handle any exceptions that might occur during the deletion of comments.

  3. The modification in the error message when the GitHub token is not provided is helpful. It now includes a link to the documentation, guiding the user on how to get the token.

  4. The changes in the README file are concise and clear, removing unnecessary placeholders and providing more specific instructions for the Quickstart section.

  5. The use of the publish_comment and remove_initial_comment methods in pr_questions.py and pr_reviewer.py is consistent and appropriate.

Overall, the PR is well-structured and the changes are logically sound. Good job!

@Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from CodiumAI-Agent Jul 6, 2023
@Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from CodiumAI-Agent Jul 6, 2023
@Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from CodiumAI-Agent Jul 6, 2023
@Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from CodiumAI-Agent Jul 6, 2023
yochail pushed a commit to yochail/pr-agent that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2024
…comment

delete "Preparing review..." comment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants