Properly fetch changed files

[mrT23]

User description

…ion, improving accuracy of diff file identification

---

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Refactored Azure DevOps provider to utilize PR iterations for detecting changes, enhancing the accuracy of diff file identification.
• Updated error logging to use formatted strings for better readability and maintenance.
• Removed the previously used commit-based change detection logic, simplifying the codebase.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	azuredevops_provider.py Refactor Azure DevOps Provider to Use PR Iterations            pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py Refactored to use PR iterations instead of commits for change detection. Improved error logging with formatted strings. Removed outdated code related to commit-based change detection. +52/-28

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Description updated to latest commit (e4565f7)

• Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	3, because the PR involves refactoring and enhancing the change detection logic in a specific provider, which requires understanding both the previous and new logic to ensure correctness. The changes are moderate in size but high in impact, requiring careful review of the logic and testing.
🏅 Score	85
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	Possible Bug: The refactoring switches from using commits to PR iterations for change detection. If iterations are not handled correctly or if there are edge cases not considered (e.g., handling of empty iterations or errors in fetching iterations), this could lead to incorrect file change detections.
	Error Handling: The refactoring includes changes to error logging. It's crucial to ensure that these changes do not obscure the visibility of errors or make debugging more difficult.
🔒 Security concerns	No

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible bug	Improve robustness by safely accessing dictionary keys Avoid using dictionary access directly on the additional_properties without checking if the key exists. This can lead to a KeyError if the expected keys are not present. Use the get method with a default value to ensure robustness. pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py [256-258] -c = change.additional_properties['item'] -diffs.append(c['path']) -diff_types[c['path']] = change.additional_properties['changeType'] +item = change.additional_properties.get('item', {}) +path = item.get('path', None) +if path: + diffs.append(path) + diff_types[path] = change.additional_properties.get('changeType', 'Unknown') Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential KeyError from direct dictionary access and proposes a safer method using .get(). This is crucial for preventing runtime errors in dynamic data handling scenarios.	8
	Ensure the changes object is properly checked before use Consider checking the type of changes before iterating over changes.change_entries. This ensures that the changes object is not None and has the attribute change_entries, preventing attribute errors. pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py [254-258] -if changes: +if changes and hasattr(changes, 'change_entries'): for change in changes.change_entries: c = change.additional_properties['item'] diffs.append(c['path']) diff_types[c['path']] = change.additional_properties['changeType'] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion correctly addresses the need to verify the existence of an attribute before accessing it, which can prevent AttributeError. This is a good practice in dynamic attribute handling.	7
Maintainability	Remove commented-out old implementation to clean up the codebase Remove the commented-out code related to the old implementation of getting PR commits and changes. Keeping old code commented out can clutter the codebase and reduce maintainability. pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py [260-283] -# wrong implementation - gets all the files that were changed in any commit in the PR -# commits = self.azure_devops_client.get_pull_request_commits( -# project=self.workspace_slug, -# repository_id=self.repo_slug, -# pull_request_id=self.pr_num, -# ) -# ... +# Code related to old implementation removed for clarity and maintainability. Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Removing commented-out code can indeed help in maintaining a cleaner and more readable codebase. This suggestion is relevant as it targets newly commented-out code in the PR, promoting better maintainability.	6

[mrT23]

@SagiMedina this is a competitor for the most severe bug ever ...

if I added and deleted a file, you would have marked it as part of the PR.
Also the 'editType' can be wrong with previous method

[bobbercheng]

/similar_issue