We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
It seems that DeliveryLocation is not covered with the updated rule (v.1.3.10)
<cac:Delivery> <cbc:ActualDeliveryDate>2014-01-01</cbc:ActualDeliveryDate> <cac:DeliveryLocation> <cbc:ID schemeID="0088">1238764941386</cbc:ID> <cac:Address> <cbc:StreetName>StreetName</cbc:StreetName> <cbc:CityName>CityName</cbc:CityName> <cbc:PostalZone>1234</cbc:PostalZone> <cac:AddressLine> <cbc:Line>AddressLine/Line</cbc:Line> </cac:AddressLine> <cac:AddressLine> <cbc:Line>AddressLine/Line</cbc:Line> </cac:AddressLine> <cac:AddressLine> <cbc:Line>AddressLine/Line</cbc:Line> </cac:AddressLine> <cac:AddressLine> <cbc:Line>AddressLine/Line</cbc:Line> </cac:AddressLine> <cac:Country> <cbc:IdentificationCode listID="ISO3166-1:Alpha2">NO</cbc:IdentificationCode> </cac:Country> </cac:Address> </cac:DeliveryLocation> </cac:Delivery>
Also I'm wondering why rule context has cac:RegistrationAddress and cac:DeliveryAddress as those are not part of EN16931 model? (https://test-docs.peppol.eu/poacc/billing/3.0/rules/ubl-tc434/)
<rule context="//cac:PostalAddress | //cac:RegistrationAddress | cac:DeliveryAddress"> <assert id="UBL-SR-51" flag="fatal" test="not(cac:AddressLine) or count(cac:AddressLine) = 1">...</assert> </rule>
With Best Regards, Jussi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks Jussi, changed the context for rule UBL-SR-51 to remove the ones not in the EN and adding the cac:Address from the DeliveryLocation.
Sorry, something went wrong.
change context for rule UBL-SR-51. Close #347
c109af9
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
It seems that DeliveryLocation is not covered with the updated rule (v.1.3.10)
Also I'm wondering why rule context has cac:RegistrationAddress and cac:DeliveryAddress as those are not part of EN16931 model? (https://test-docs.peppol.eu/poacc/billing/3.0/rules/ubl-tc434/)
With Best Regards,
Jussi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: