Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CII BT-17 and BT-18 checks to be improved #353

Closed
phax opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

CII BT-17 and BT-18 checks to be improved #353

phax opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
Format CII
Milestone
1.3.11

Comments

@phax
Copy link
Collaborator

phax commented Jul 18, 2023

BT-17 ("Tender or lot reference") and BT-18 ("Invoiced object identifier") both map to the same elements:
/rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice/rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeAgreement/ram:AdditionalReferencedDocument/ram:IssuerAssignedID and
/rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice/rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeAgreement/ram:AdditionalReferencedDocument/ram:TypeCode

BT-17 requires a TypeCode value of 50.
BT-18 requires a TypeCode value of 130.

Please add rules, that the respective TypeCode values 50 and 130 occur only once.

Please bare in mind, that BT-128 ("Invoice line object identifier") also uses the TypeCode value of 130.
@oriol oriol added this to the 1.3.11 milestone Sep 27, 2023
@oriol
Copy link
Collaborator

oriol commented Sep 28, 2023

Added rules CII-SR-457 and CII-SR-458

oriol added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2023
@oriol
add rules CII-SR-457 and CII-SR-458 closes #353
9b2f4dd
@oriol oriol closed this as completed Sep 28, 2023
@bdewein bdewein mentioned this issue Dec 11, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Format CII
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.3.11
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@phax @oriol