Skip to content

DSB Maintenance Iteration 19: Agenda (15 May 2024)

CDR API Stream edited this page May 15, 2024 · 1 revision

Meeting Details

Housekeeping

Recording

The Maintenance Iteration Calls are recorded for note taking purposes only. All recordings are kept securely, as are the transcripts which may be made from them. No identifying material will be provided without the participant's consent. Participants may email contact@consumerdatastandards.gov.au should they have any further questions or wish to have any material redacted from the record.

Acknowledgement of Country

We acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the various lands on which we work today and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people participating in this call.

We pay our respects to Elders past and present and recognise and celebrate the diversity of Aboriginal peoples and their ongoing cultures and connections to the lands and waters of Australia.

Agenda

  • Introductions
  • Release Plan
  • Upcoming Workshop
  • Requirements Analysis
  • Maintenance Iteration 19 Candidates
  • Any other business

Introductions

The purpose of this meeting is to continue discussion on the candidates identified for Maintenance Iteration 19.

Release Plan

  • The outcome of Maintenance Iteration 19 will likely be published in v1.31.0.

Upcoming Workshop

Requirements analysis

Domain # Issue Comments
Common 610 Addition of an (18 or over) Age Verification Flag In progress, no update
Security 628 Addition of a DH-side endpoint for querying the status of a consent establishment flow In discussion with ADRs
Banking 636 Remove BankingTransactionDetail and incorporate extendedData into BankingTransaction In progress

Maintenance Iteration 19 Candidates

Domain # Issue Change Type
MI19 638 Maintenance Iteration 19 Holistic Feedback Candidate
CX 633 Collection Consents - Authorisation Amendment To be determined
Energy 640 Retirement date for Get Generic Plan Detail v2 and Get Energy Account Detail v3 Candidate
Documentation 362 Security Profile: Request Object - Inconsistency in example for sharing_duration and cdr_arrangement_id Candidate
Documentation 415 Disambiguation of the claims for a response from the introspection endpoint Candidate
Documentation 573 Clarification on handling of standard claims in request object Candidate

Any other business

Participants are invited to raise topics related to the Consumer Data Standards that would benefit from the groups' consideration.

Clone this wiki locally