Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Updated discussion areas for README for CIPs #107

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Updated discussion areas for README for CIPs #107

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
a532508
Updated discussion areas for README for CIPs
davestaxcp Sep 5, 2023
8da2bd7
Update README - Commit#2.md
davestaxcp Sep 17, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
This is the repository for Counterparty Improvement Proposals, also known as "CIPs". People wishing to submit CIPs, first should propose their idea or document to the `spec-proposals` channel on the [Counterparty Slack chat](http://slack.counterparty.io/). After discussion and copy-editing and acceptance, it will be published here, normally as a pull request merge.
This is the repository for Counterparty Improvement Proposals, also known as "CIPs". People wishing to submit CIPs, first should propose their idea or document on the [Counterparty CIP Discussions](https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/discussions) github section. Many pre-draft discussions are also presented on the [Counterparty Developer Telegram](https://t.me/Counterparty_Dev). After discussion and copy-editing and acceptance, it will be published here, normally as a pull request merge.

The CIP process will follow the [Counterparty Improvement Proposals (CIP) process](https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/blob/master/cip-0001.md) as closely as is reasonably possible. We are fairly liberal with approving CIPs, and try not to be too involved in decision making on behalf of the community. The exception is in very rare cases of dispute resolution when a decision is contentious and cannot be agreed upon. In those cases, the conservative option will always be preferred.

Expand Down