Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider xUnit Tests #6

Closed
Werebunny opened this issue Mar 29, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider xUnit Tests #6

Werebunny opened this issue Mar 29, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Werebunny
Copy link
Member

Expected Behavior

Tests use xUnit.

Current Behavior

Tests use MSTest.

Additional Information

Integrating the Randomizer with theories shows potential for cleaner tests.

@Werebunny Werebunny added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 29, 2018
@Werebunny Werebunny added this to To do in Create & Track via automation Mar 29, 2018
@Werebunny
Copy link
Member Author

Integration works wonderfully. Will be pursing additional tool support to make attribute creation easier.

Weirdly, xUnit tests have issues with OpenCover not recognizing or failing to merge with preprocessor directive cases. Hopefully switching coverage tooling will resolve this (see #8 ).

@Werebunny Werebunny moved this from To do to In progress in Create & Track Apr 23, 2018
@Werebunny Werebunny self-assigned this Apr 23, 2018
Werebunny added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2018
Create & Track automation moved this from In progress to Done Apr 23, 2018
Werebunny added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2018
* Fix #6: Switched to xUnit.

* Ignore trying to use types from assemblies that can't load.

* Adjusts tests for delay resolution accuracy.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant