You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there any particular reason why GNSS-derived Altitude (GA) in subfield 4 of I062/110 is not scaled? As per notes in the spec:
GA is coded as a 14-bit two’s complement binary number with an LSB of 25 ft. irrespective of the setting of RES. The minimum value of GA that can be reported is -1000 ft.
Suggest adding scale, minimum and unit to GA. Proposed changes and a sample message capture are attached. 062-110-GA.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is there any particular reason why GNSS-derived Altitude (GA) in subfield 4 of I062/110 is not scaled? As per notes in the spec:
GA is coded as a 14-bit two’s complement binary number with an LSB of 25 ft. irrespective of the setting of RES.
The minimum value of GA that can be reported is -1000 ft.
Suggest adding scale, minimum and unit to GA. Proposed changes and a sample message capture are attached.
062-110-GA.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: