Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support license.acknowledgment #1051

Closed
jkowalleck opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1052
Closed

feat: support license.acknowledgment #1051

jkowalleck opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1052
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request schema 1.6 related to CycloneDX spec v1.6

Comments

@jkowalleck
Copy link
Member

as of CycloneDX 1.6, there is support to express the license acknowledgement.
see https://cyclonedx.org/docs/1.6/json/#components_items_licenses_oneOf_i0_items_license_acknowledgement

Request: add support for this in the library.

@jkowalleck jkowalleck added enhancement New feature or request schema 1.6 related to CycloneDX spec v1.6 labels Apr 24, 2024
@jkowalleck jkowalleck self-assigned this Apr 24, 2024
jkowalleck added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2024
fixes #1051


## Changed
  * Serializers and `License`-Normalizers will take license acknowledgement into account ([#1051] via [#1052])
## Added:
  * Namespace `Enums` 
    * New enum `LicenseAcknowledgement` ([#1051] via [#1052])
  * Namespace `Models`
    * Class `LicenseExpression` got new property `acknowledgement` ([#1051]
via [#1052])
    * Class `NamedLicense` got new property `acknowledgement` ([#1051] via [#1052])
    * Class `SpdxLicense` got new property `acknowledgement` ([#1051] via [#1052])

[#1051]: #1051
[#1052]: #1052

---------

Signed-off-by: Jan Kowalleck <jan.kowalleck@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request schema 1.6 related to CycloneDX spec v1.6
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant