Regression 7493 Initialization of void[][N] #866
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This test didn't compile with -w
WalterBright
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2012
Regression 7493 Initialization of void[][N]
WalterBright
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2012
braddr
pushed a commit
to braddr/dmd
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2012
Expanded test for issue# 8792.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make it so that:
void []...[N] arr = foo
is never a block assignment, except for the necessary:
void []...[N] arr = null
Ie, foo must always be an array of length N with members that implicitly convert to void[]...
I think this is the most defensible and predictable semantics for this bizarre corner case.
However, note that the spec doesn't mention block assignment at all.