Adds contributors section to README #55
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rule is if you've: 1. Contributed code to the core framework 2. Contributed an example 3. Contributed a design review/API review/docs review you count.
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Reviewed the entire pull request up to 63ebcec
- Looked at
15lines of code in1files - Took 23 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%.
1. README.md:82:
- Assessed confidence :
50% - Comment:
Please ensure that all contributors listed have indeed contributed to the project in the ways described in the PR description (code contribution, example contribution, or design/API/docs review). - Reasoning:
The PR is adding a contributors section to the README file. The changes are straightforward and there doesn't seem to be any logical, performance, or security bugs. However, it would be good to ensure that the contributors listed have indeed contributed to the project in the ways described in the PR description.
Workflow ID: wflow_TTAtRb9xwjG2bcFH
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on eb7387d
- Looked at
14lines of code in1files - Took 50 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%.
1. README.md:82:
- Assessed confidence :
0% - Comment:
The Contributors section is a great addition to acknowledge the work of contributors. The changes are clear and the links to the contributors' GitHub profiles are correctly formatted. - Reasoning:
The PR is straightforward and doesn't seem to have any issues. The author has added a Contributors section to the README file, listing four contributors with their respective GitHub profiles. This is a common practice in open-source projects to acknowledge the work of contributors. I don't see any violations of best practices, logical bugs, performance bugs, or security bugs. The changes are clear and concise, and the links to the contributors' GitHub profiles are correctly formatted.
Workflow ID: wflow_Dlvl4Av9Ra6duoeK
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rule is if you've:
Summary:
This PR adds a
Contributorssection to theREADME.mdfile, acknowledging the contributions of four individuals to the project.Key points:
Contributorssection toREADME.md.Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev