New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Additional brainstorming about REST functionality that needs to be created #7
Conversation
endpoints.md
Outdated
@@ -12,4 +12,42 @@ | |||
* /api/core/sites | |||
|
|||
## Proposed Endpoints | |||
* /api/discover | |||
* /api/discover/(dso)?(sort) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/api/discover/search
- to provide access the the discovery search. The supported parameters could be:
- profile (similar to the current location parameter but more general so that we can provide different configuration for the repository, for a community, etc.)
- facet (values to apply, to exclude, etc.)
- query (the generic query string to apply)
- sort (the sort conditions)
/api/discover/browse
- to provide access to the browse system. it should return the list of available browse indexes. On a specific browse indexes /api/discover/browse/ the supported parameters could be:
- sort
- filter value (on metadata browse)
endpoints.md
Outdated
* /api/user/eperson | ||
* /api/user/epersongroup | ||
* /api/authorize/(dso) | ||
* /api/submit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure. Item should be created with a POST to the /core/item endpoint.
We need to decide if we want an endpoint also for workspaceitem and workflowitem or if we want to support the workflow as a status of the item to update to trigger a workflow advance
@abollini , I integrated your comments into this PR |
It will be difficult to continue the conversation over all the endpoints introduced in this PR in a single thread. I propose to merge these changes in the contract as they are now and open specific issue/PR for each single endpoint that we like to expand, discuss further |
Small changes to the external authority control
[DSC-109] Added brand new endpoint Approved-by: Andrea Bollini
I am submitting this PR to generate additional conversation about features that need to be implemented.