-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
jdbc rangeSplitStrategy extension #914
Labels
feature-request
this is a feature requests on the product
Comments
Paddy0523
added a commit
to Paddy0523/chunjun
that referenced
this issue
Jun 6, 2022
… ,support range splitStrategy 2.polling mode support range splitStrategy
Paddy0523
added a commit
to Paddy0523/chunjun
that referenced
this issue
Jun 6, 2022
…support range splitStrategy 2.polling mode support range splitStrategy
FlechazoW
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 6, 2022
… range splitStrategy 2.polling mode support range splitStrategy
PR merged. |
yanghuaiGit
pushed a commit
to yanghuaiGit/chunjun
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2022
…support range splitStrategy 2.polling mode support range splitStrategy
yanghuaiGit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2022
… range splitStrategy 2.polling mode support range splitStrategy
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Range slices can be read sequentially on disk if splitPk is incremented in the table. It can improve performance to some extent
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/46181516/172116745-018ab325-a78e-4872-9ef3-2fe399f7f43d.png)
1.incremental mode with parallelism >1 ,support range splitStrategy
2.polling mode support range splitStrategy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: