fix: Fixing voting power on vote transaction for snapshot guilds

[rossneilson]

Description

Fixes

• Issue of sending non snapshot voting power to contract despite UI showing correct amount (test by creating proposal->lock tokens->vote in proposal)
• Fixes position of quorum flag
• Adds ENS subdomain usage for contracts and tokens
• Uses new token list
• Makes token list scrollable

Closes #412

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce.

Checklist:

• My code follows the existing style of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any UI changes have been tested and made responsive for mobile views

[github-actions]

✔️ Preview deployment is ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 6f7fef8

😎 Browse the preview at one of these gateways:

• https://bafybeie23iqwd54kndd5ibjsp447yhs5jvh7r5deeobui6hiokjrtsu37u.ipfs.cf-ipfs.com
• https://bafybeie23iqwd54kndd5ibjsp447yhs5jvh7r5deeobui6hiokjrtsu37u.ipfs.dweb.link
• https://bafybeie23iqwd54kndd5ibjsp447yhs5jvh7r5deeobui6hiokjrtsu37u.ipfs.ipfs-gateway.cloud

[github-actions]

✔️ Storybook deployment is ready!

😎 Browse Storybook: https://bafybeihvsgeahtvnnuxmtyttkcu7dbuijf4o4qjfqwzut5yduhvgmm4qpy.ipfs.cf-ipfs.com

[github-actions]

✔️ Preview deployment is ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 43fbc33

😎 Browse the preview at one of these gateways:

• https://bafybeibmdkssdv2dibrachbyg6x7grsklwad5k7a6wyoab5oviibdfvemu.ipfs.cf-ipfs.com
• https://bafybeibmdkssdv2dibrachbyg6x7grsklwad5k7a6wyoab5oviibdfvemu.ipfs.dweb.link
• https://bafybeibmdkssdv2dibrachbyg6x7grsklwad5k7a6wyoab5oviibdfvemu.ipfs.ipfs-gateway.cloud

[github-actions]

✔️ Storybook deployment is ready!

😎 Browse Storybook: https://bafybeid6dbgvjnoszp2u4uookowdsduew55s7oyod6zkirx33cisoj4yi4.ipfs.cf-ipfs.com

[github-actions]

✔️ Preview deployment is ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 5f57573

😎 Browse the preview at one of these gateways:

• https://bafybeiatooyhloffqqk5pfyl4orxav3t3zf4jzcnp4tlfyujiyk4erycpu.ipfs.cf-ipfs.com
• https://bafybeiatooyhloffqqk5pfyl4orxav3t3zf4jzcnp4tlfyujiyk4erycpu.ipfs.dweb.link
• https://bafybeiatooyhloffqqk5pfyl4orxav3t3zf4jzcnp4tlfyujiyk4erycpu.ipfs.ipfs-gateway.cloud

[github-actions]

✔️ Storybook deployment is ready!

😎 Browse Storybook: https://bafybeicad7t5r2q3gdo56j7g6hcxa6x6jumjrxuwhbyqbvpgc6la7rrqoq.ipfs.cf-ipfs.com

[Filipv95]

Hey @rossneilson jsut to double check, I've created Proposal with 25% VP, locked more tokens and got 33% VP, when I voted in Proposal my vote impact was 25% VP.
If I understood this is correct behavior because snapshots is done at the moment proposal is created, right?