Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A search engine for finding academic papers using the same or similar mathematical formulas #1

Open
Daniel-Mietchen opened this issue Feb 10, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Owner

The basic idea here is to go through the literature and to use the similarity of the maths used in different papers as another discovery mechanism for finding related papers, i.e. papers that are related via their maths, rather than the specific knowledge domain they focus on (if any).

Some basic discussion of the concept is in
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/162487/which-tools-can-identify-scholarly-papers-that-use-the-same-types-of-equations ,
where Approach0 was recently mentioned as an open-source tool that has started to do this for MathOverflow.

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Owner Author

1h to get things started. Also adding the 1day label as prototyping this could be a hackathon project.

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Owner Author

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Owner Author

Here's an interesting twist to this story - combining MathML markup with Wikidata identifiers to increase findability and convey the semantics of a formula ore clearly:
https://twitter.com/WikiResearch/status/1025188636969422849 .

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Owner Author

Paper: A Critical Survey of Mathematical Search Engines (paywalled)

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Owner Author

Here is a profile of papers using a common mathematical concept (Bayes' theorem): https://scholia.toolforge.org/use/Q182505 .

Note that the tagging here is mainly based on text mining, not formula mining.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant