Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Swoole Integration #2595
feat: Swoole Integration #2595
Changes from 10 commits
f6b2b9f
e56fc3f
738495c
bf27730
33e5f1d
75d6e5d
741b610
96dfe24
410f194
04b301a
6479abc
93a5470
c3c7673
312faa1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
really? TLS should be independent from the protocol, unless that's something special swoole does?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's wrong
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed this part to use the server's SSL property. Since I seemingly don't have access to the URL, I think that's the best way of infering the scheme
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, checking ssl vs non-ssl is the right way to do that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't look right to me. &$rootSpan will not necessarily be the root span the Request was started with - multiple requests may run in parallel with swoole.
In the begin hook, use
$rootSpan = $hook->span(new \DDTrace\SpanStack);
. Then you also don't have to manually close the span in the end hook. The span can be accessed in the end span with$hook->span()
(but this is unnecessary, as it's now a hook span, which will inherit the exception anyway).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed 👍 That makes me wonder whether we should do the same for the RoadRunner integration 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense there too, but for roadrunner it's not a bug at least.