Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable priority sampling by default #774

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Dec 12, 2018

Conversation

brettlangdon
Copy link
Member

We want to enable priority sampling by default now.

@brettlangdon brettlangdon added this to the 0.19.0 milestone Dec 10, 2018
@palazzem palazzem self-requested a review December 11, 2018 09:32
Copy link

@palazzem palazzem left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd say only to update the doc to not show how to disable Priority Sampling. At the moment there is no reason to disable it so let's discard that part.

docs/advanced_usage.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ddtrace/tracer.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@palazzem palazzem left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you very much!

For reference, we're targeting automatically endpoint v0.4 with a fallback system that downgrades the connection to endpoint v0.3 if missing (404). This change in the default is reasonably safe.

Also, our Agent added the Priority Sampling endpoint with this PR: https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-trace-agent/pull/310/files#diff-e8961f81006d547c70ab424318805bbaR99

that landed on this release (3 Nov 2017): https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-trace-agent/releases/tag/5.19.0

@brettlangdon brettlangdon changed the base branch from 0.18-dev to 0.19-dev December 12, 2018 20:55
@brettlangdon brettlangdon merged commit 445d327 into 0.19-dev Dec 12, 2018
@brettlangdon brettlangdon deleted the brettlangdon/priroity-sampling branch December 21, 2018 19:47
@brettlangdon brettlangdon mentioned this pull request Dec 28, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants