-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[e2e] Resurrecting e2e tests on kind with envtest framework #67
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This pull request contains a valid label.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This pull request contains a valid label.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This pull request contains a valid label.
4431122
to
fc77f2c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This pull request contains a valid label.
fc77f2c
to
9f10708
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This pull request contains a valid label.
…amework - Added initial tests for testing autoPause and autoFail of canary on pod restarts.
9f10708
to
f1e9300
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This pull request contains a valid label.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This pull request contains a valid label.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #67 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 31.39% 31.39%
=======================================
Files 37 37
Lines 2758 2758
=======================================
Hits 866 866
Misses 1809 1809
Partials 83 83
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome work @xornivore 🥇
Co-authored-by: Cedric Lamoriniere <cedric.lamoriniere@datadoghq.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This pull request contains a valid label.
What does this PR do?
Motivation
Additional Notes
Anything else we should know when reviewing?
Describe your test plan
Write there any instructions and details you may have to test your PR.