Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
6 changed files
with
337 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ | ||
#' Create a process-tracing design | ||
#' | ||
#' Builds a design in which two pieces of evidence are sought and used to update about whether X caused Y using Bayes' rule. | ||
#' | ||
#' @details | ||
#' | ||
#' The model posits a population of \code{N} cases, each of which does or does not exhibit the presence of some outcome, Y. With probability \code{prob_X}, each case also exhibits the presence or absence of some potential cause, X. The outcome Y can be realized through four distinct causal relations, distributed through the population of cases according to \code{process_proportions}. First, the presence of X might cause Y. Second, the absence of X might cause Y. Third, Y might be present irrespective of X. Fourth, Y might be absent irrespective of X. | ||
#' | ||
#' Our inquiry is a "cause of effects" question. We wish to know whether a specific case was one in which the presence (absence) of X caused the presence (absence) of Y. | ||
#' | ||
#' Our data strategy consists of selecting one case at random in which both X and Y are present. As part of the data strategy we seek two pieces of evidence in favor or against the hypothesized causal relationship, H, in which X causes Y. | ||
#' | ||
#' The first (second) piece of evidence is observed with probability \code{p_E1_H} (\code{p_E2_H}) when H is true, and with probability \code{p_E1_not_H} (\code{p_E2_not_H}) when H is false. | ||
#' | ||
#' Conditional on H being true (false), the correlation between the two pieces of evidence is given by \code{cor_E1E2_H} (\code{cor_E1E2_not_H}). | ||
#' | ||
#' The researcher uses Bayes’ rule to update about the probability that X caused Y given the evidence. In other words, they form a posterior inference, Pr(H|E). We specify four answer strategies for forming this inference. The first simply ignores the evidence and is equivalent to stating a prior belief without doing any causal process tracing. The second conditions inferences only on the first piece of evidence, and the third only on the second piece of evidence. The fourth strategy conditions posterior inferences on both pieces of evidence simultaneously. | ||
#' | ||
#' We specify as diagnosands for this design the bias, RMSE, mean(estimand), mean(estimate) and sd(estimate). | ||
#' | ||
#' @param N An integer. Size of population of cases from which a single case is selected. | ||
#' @param prior_H A number in [0,1]. Prior probability that X causes Y in a given case in which X and Y are both present. | ||
#' @param prob_X A number in [0,1]. Probability that X = 1 for a given case (equal throughout population of cases). | ||
#' @param process_proportions A vector of numbers in [0,1] that sums to 1. Simplex denoting the proportion of cases in the population in which, respectively: 1) X causes Y; 2) Y occurs regardless of X; 3) X causes the absence of Y; 4) Y is absent regardless of X. | ||
#' @param p_E1_H A number in [0,1]. Probability of observing first piece of evidence given hypothesis that X caused Y is true. | ||
#' @param p_E2_H A number in [0,1]. Probability of observing second piece of evidence given hypothesis that X caused Y is true. | ||
#' @param p_E1_not_H A number in [0,1]. Probability of observing first piece of evidence given hypothesis that X caused Y is not true. | ||
#' @param p_E2_not_H A number in [0,1]. Probability of observing second piece of evidence given hypothesis that X caused Y is not true. | ||
#' @param cor_E1E2_H A number in [-1,1]. Correlation between first and second pieces of evidence given hypothesis that X caused Y is true. | ||
#' @param cor_E1E2_not_H A number in [-1,1]. Correlation between first and second pieces of evidence given hypothesis that X caused Y is not true. | ||
#' @param label_E1 A string. Label for the first piece of evidence (e.g., "Smoking Gun"). | ||
#' @param label_E2 A string. Label for the second piece of evidence (e.g., "Straw in the Wind"). | ||
#' @return A process-tracing design. | ||
#' @author \href{https://declaredesign.org/}{DeclareDesign Team} | ||
#' @concept qualitative | ||
#' @concept process tracing | ||
#' @import DeclareDesign stats utils fabricatr estimatr randomizr | ||
#' @export | ||
#' @examples | ||
#' # Generate a process-tracing design using default arguments: | ||
#' pt_1 <- process_tracing_designer() | ||
#' get_estimands(pt_1) | ||
#' get_estimates(pt_1) | ||
#' draw_data(pt_1) | ||
#' \dontrun{ | ||
#' diagnose_design(pt_1, sims = 1000) | ||
#' } | ||
#' | ||
#' # A design in which the smoking gun and straw-in-the-wind are correlated | ||
#' pt_2 <- process_tracing_designer(cor_E1E2_H = .32) | ||
#' \dontrun{ | ||
#' diagnose_design(pt_2, sims = 1000) | ||
#' } | ||
#' | ||
#' # A design with two doubly-decisive tests pointing in opposite directions | ||
#' pt_3 <- process_tracing_designer(p_E1_H = .80,p_E1_not_H = .05, | ||
#' label_E1 = "Doubly-Decisive: H", | ||
#' p_E2_H = .05,p_E2_not_H = .80, | ||
#' label_E2 = "Doubly-Decisive: Not H") | ||
#' get_estimates(pt_3) | ||
#' \dontrun{ | ||
#' diagnose_design(pt_3, sims = 1000) | ||
#' } | ||
#' | ||
process_tracing_designer <- function( | ||
N = 100, | ||
prob_X = .5, | ||
process_proportions = c('X_causes_Y' = .25, 'Y_regardless' = .25, | ||
'X_causes_not_Y' = .25, 'not_Y_regardless' = .25), | ||
prior_H = .5, | ||
p_E1_H = .3, | ||
p_E1_not_H = 0, | ||
p_E2_H = .8, | ||
p_E2_not_H = .2, | ||
cor_E1E2_H = 0, | ||
cor_E1E2_not_H = 0, | ||
label_E1 = "Smoking Gun", | ||
label_E2 = "Straw in the Wind" | ||
){ | ||
if(!rlang::is_integerish(N) || N < 1) stop("N must be a positive integer.") | ||
if(prob_X < 0 || prob_X > 1) stop("prob_X must be in [0,1].") | ||
if(length(process_proportions) != 4) stop("process_proportions must be of length 4.") | ||
if(sum(process_proportions) != 1 || any(process_proportions < 0) || any(process_proportions> 1)) stop("process_proportions must be a 3-simplex.") | ||
if(prior_H < 0 || prior_H > 1) stop("prior_H must be in [0,1].") | ||
if(p_E1_H < 0 || p_E1_H > 1) stop("p_E1_H must be in [0,1].") | ||
if(p_E2_H < 0 || p_E2_H > 1) stop("p_E2_H must be in [0,1].") | ||
if(p_E1_not_H < 0 || p_E1_not_H > 1) stop("p_E1_not_H must be in [0,1].") | ||
if(p_E2_not_H < 0 || p_E2_not_H > 1) stop("p_E2_not_H must be in [0,1].") | ||
if(abs(cor_E1E2_H) > 1) stop("cor_E1E2_H must be in [-1,1].") | ||
if(abs(cor_E1E2_not_H) > 1) stop("cor_E1E2_not_H must be in [-1,1].") | ||
test_prob <- function(p1, p2, rho) { | ||
r = rho * (p1 * p2 * (1 - p1) * (1 - p2))^.5 | ||
c((1 - p1) * (1 - p2) + r,p2 * (1 - p1) - r, p1 * (1 - p2) - r, p1 * p2 + r)} | ||
if(min(test_prob(p_E1_H, p_E2_H, cor_E1E2_H)) < 0) stop("Correlation coefficient not compatible with probabilities") | ||
if(min(test_prob(p_E1_not_H, p_E2_not_H, cor_E1E2_not_H)) < 0) stop("Correlation coefficient not compatible with probabilities") | ||
if(!rlang::is_character(label_E1) || length(label_E1) > 1) stop("label_E1 must be a character of length 1.") | ||
if(!rlang::is_character(label_E2) || length(label_E2) > 1) stop("label_E2 must be a character of length 1.") | ||
{{{ | ||
# M: Model | ||
population <- declare_population( | ||
N = N, | ||
causal_process = sample( | ||
x = c('X_causes_Y', 'Y_regardless', | ||
'X_causes_not_Y', 'not_Y_regardless'), | ||
size = N, | ||
replace = TRUE, | ||
prob = process_proportions), | ||
X = rbinom(N, 1, prob_X) == 1, | ||
Y = (X & causal_process == "X_causes_Y") | # 1. X causes Y | ||
(!X & causal_process == "X_causes_not_Y") | # 2. Not X causes Y | ||
(causal_process == "Y_regardless") # 3. Y happens irrespective of X | ||
) | ||
# D: Data Strategy 1 | ||
select_case <- declare_sampling( | ||
strata = paste(X, Y), | ||
strata_n = c("X0Y0" = 0, "X0Y1" = 0, "X1Y0" = 0, "X1Y1" = 1)) | ||
# I: Inquiry | ||
estimand <- | ||
declare_estimand(did_X_cause_Y = causal_process == 'X_causes_Y') | ||
# D: Data Strategy 2 | ||
# Calculate bivariate probabilities given correlation | ||
joint_prob <- function(p1, p2, rho) { | ||
r <- rho * (p1 * p2 * (1 - p1) * (1 - p2)) ^ .5 | ||
c( | ||
p00 = (1 - p1) * (1 - p2) + r, | ||
p01 = p2 * (1 - p1) - r, | ||
p10 = p1 * (1 - p2) - r, | ||
p11 = p1 * p2 + r)} | ||
joint_prob_H <- joint_prob(p_E1_H, p_E2_H, cor_E1E2_H) | ||
joint_prob_not_H <- joint_prob(p_E1_not_H, p_E2_not_H, cor_E1E2_not_H) | ||
|
||
trace_processes <- declare_step( | ||
test_results = sample( | ||
c("00", "01", "10", "11"),1, | ||
prob = ifelse(rep(causal_process == "X_causes_Y", 4), | ||
joint_prob_H, | ||
joint_prob_not_H)), | ||
E1 = test_results == "10" | test_results == "11", | ||
E2 = test_results == "01" | test_results == "11", | ||
handler = fabricate) | ||
|
||
# A: Answer Strategy | ||
bayes_estimator <- function(data, p_H = prior_H, p_E_H, p_E_not_H, | ||
label, result) { | ||
data.frame( | ||
posterior_H = p_E_H * p_H / | ||
(p_E_H * p_H + p_E_not_H * (1 - p_H)), | ||
estimator_label = label, | ||
estimand_label = "did_X_cause_Y", | ||
test_results = result | ||
)} | ||
no_tests <- declare_estimator( | ||
handler = bayes_estimator, | ||
p_E_H = 1, | ||
p_E_not_H = 1, | ||
label = "No tests (Prior)", | ||
result = TRUE | ||
) | ||
smoking_gun <- declare_estimator( | ||
handler = bayes_estimator, | ||
p_E_H = ifelse(data$E1, p_E1_H, 1 - p_E1_H), | ||
p_E_not_H = ifelse(data$E1, p_E1_not_H, 1 - p_E1_not_H), | ||
label = label_E1, | ||
result = data$E1 | ||
) | ||
straw_in_wind <- declare_estimator( | ||
handler = bayes_estimator, | ||
p_E_H = ifelse(data$E2, p_E2_H, 1 - p_E2_H), | ||
p_E_not_H = ifelse(data$E2, p_E2_not_H, 1 - p_E2_not_H), | ||
label = label_E2, | ||
result = data$E2 | ||
) | ||
|
||
joint_test <- declare_estimator( | ||
handler = bayes_estimator, | ||
p_E_H = joint_prob_H[c("00", "01", "10", "11") %in% data$test_results], | ||
p_E_not_H = joint_prob_not_H[c("00", "01", "10", "11") %in% data$test_results], | ||
label = paste(label_E1, "and", label_E2), | ||
result = data$test_results | ||
) | ||
|
||
# Design | ||
process_tracing_design <- | ||
population + select_case + trace_processes + estimand + | ||
no_tests + smoking_gun + straw_in_wind + joint_test | ||
|
||
|
||
}}} | ||
|
||
attr(process_tracing_design, "code") <- | ||
construct_design_code(process_tracing_designer, match.call.defaults()) | ||
|
||
process_tracing_design <- set_diagnosands( | ||
process_tracing_design, | ||
diagnosands = declare_diagnosands( | ||
bias = mean(posterior_H - estimand), | ||
rmse = sqrt(mean((posterior_H - estimand)^2)), | ||
mean_estimand = mean(estimand), | ||
mean_posterior = mean(posterior_H), | ||
sd_posterior = sd(posterior_H), | ||
keep_defaults = FALSE | ||
)) | ||
|
||
process_tracing_design | ||
} | ||
|
||
attr(process_tracing_designer,"shiny_arguments") <- list( | ||
prior_H = c(.25,.5), | ||
p_E1_H = c(.3,.8), | ||
cor_E1E2_H = c(0,.32) | ||
) | ||
attr(process_tracing_designer,"tips") <- c( | ||
prior_H = "Prior probability that the hypothesis that X causes Y is true.", | ||
p_E1_H = "Probability of observing the first piece of evidence given X causes Y.", | ||
cor_E1E2_H = "Correlation in first and second piece of evidence given X causes Y." | ||
) | ||
attr(process_tracing_designer,"description") <- "A process-tracing design in which two pieces of evidence are sought and used to update about whether X caused Y using Bayes' rule." | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters