New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review and Approve Findings #64
Comments
Hmm. Status is an interesting field because it is generated on the fly based on other selections in the finding model: https://github.com/rackerlabs/django-DefectDojo/blob/master/dojo/models.py#l527. |
@aaronweaver in looking at #62, it would have to be completed before we can move on this one. Do we think those folks would ever be assigned a Finding for review? Are we strictly sticking to Staff and Superusers as reviewers? |
@aaronweaver, @devGregA - should Findings under review be counted in the metrics? If yes, then no code changes are needed. If no, then I will have to dig through all the places where metrics are calculated and add the additional check. |
I think that findings under review are equivalent to not verified findings and could use the same boolean? |
@aaronweaver, @devGregA - perfect, that is the way i started coding it. As soon as it is mark for review the Active attribute will be set to false. Everything that acts on the active switch should fall in line. Thanks! |
@aaronweaver, @devGregA - Findings are now able to be marked for review. Users are able to select any This update requires the following commands: |
Release Version 2.31.4.1
Sometimes findings need to be peer reviewed by other reviewers. I'd like the ability to be able to assign a status to the finding of 'Under Review'. When a finding is under review that finding can be assigned to other system reviewers and will notify them that the finding needs to be reviewed. Optionally an email should be sent out notifying a reviewer that there is a finding that should be reviewed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: