🐛 Fix RedHatSatellite components #10082
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.
Note 🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded. Powered by DryRun Security |
manuel-sommer
force-pushed
the
fix_redhatsatellite_components
branch
from
0c53a41
to
68d9c0b
Compare
cneill
approved these changes
May 2, 2024
Maffooch
approved these changes
May 3, 2024
blakeaowens
approved these changes
May 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This Bugfix puts the packages into the description field and removes it from the components field within the RedHatSatellite parser. The reason is that RedHatSatellite sometimes delivers a huge package list which exceeds the 500 characters limit of the components field. We would have to make a database migration which is right now limited to 500 character to at least 10000 characters. That is why I decided to move the content to the description field.