Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[express-serve-static-core] missiong type of router.stack: Layer[] (#63290) #63329

Conversation

DerHerrGammler
Copy link

Please fill in this template.

Select one of these and delete the others:

If changing an existing definition:

  • Provide a URL to documentation or source code which provides context for the suggested changes: <>

Layer core code: https://github.com/expressjs/express/blob/master/lib/router/layer.js
Route core code: https://github.com/expressjs/express/blob/master/lib/router/route.js
a additional manipulation of those tyoes happens in other files

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

typescript-bot commented Nov 20, 2022

@DerHerrGammler Thank you for submitting this PR! I see this is your first time submitting to DefinitelyTyped 👋 — I'm the local bot who will help you through the process of getting things through.

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

1 package in this PR

Code Reviews

Because this is a widely-used package, a DT maintainer will need to review it before it can be merged.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

  • ❌ No merge conflicts
  • ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
  • 🕐 Most recent commit is approved by a DT maintainer

Once every item on this list is checked, I'll ask you for permission to merge and publish the changes.

Inactive

This PR has been inactive for 64 days — it is considered abandoned, and therefore closed!


Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR
{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 63329,
  "author": "DerHerrGammler",
  "headCommitOid": "146a527e1fc477821f3844493e459fb8434fd4c1",
  "mergeBaseOid": "30d9a69b09462171fc5bc63b3f20a2e0e40e28af",
  "lastPushDate": "2022-11-20T01:20:00.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2022-12-11T22:13:31.000Z",
  "hasMergeConflict": true,
  "isFirstContribution": true,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "hugeChange": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Critical",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": "express-serve-static-core",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/express-serve-static-core/express-serve-static-core-tests.ts",
          "kind": "test"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/express-serve-static-core/index.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "borisyankov",
        "micksatana",
        "samijaber",
        "JoseLion",
        "dwrss",
        "andoshin11"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Critical"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [
    {
      "type": "changereq",
      "reviewer": "navya9singh",
      "date": "2022-12-09T23:27:45.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "mainBotCommentID": 1321007986,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🔔 @borisyankov @micksatana @samijaber @JoseLion @dwrss @andoshin11 — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added this to Waiting for Code Reviews in New Pull Request Status Board Nov 20, 2022
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Waiting for Code Reviews to Needs Maintainer Review in New Pull Request Status Board Nov 20, 2022
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the Unreviewed No one showed up to review this PR, so it'll be reviewed by a DT maintainer. label Dec 1, 2022
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Re-ping @borisyankov, @micksatana, @samijaber, @JoseLion, @dwrss, @andoshin11:

This PR has been out for over a week, yet I haven't seen any reviews.

Could someone please give it some attention? Thanks!

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

It has been more than two weeks and this PR still has no reviews.

I'll bump it to the DT maintainer queue. Thank you for your patience, @DerHerrGammler.

(Ping @borisyankov, @micksatana, @samijaber, @JoseLion, @dwrss, @andoshin11.)

@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Needs Maintainer Review to Needs Maintainer Action in New Pull Request Status Board Dec 8, 2022
route?: Route;
}

export interface Route {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How is Route different from IRoute?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In IRoute it semes that there always exists the definitions of the funtion but in the Route interface are no definitions of any methodes. And instead there is a methods object that defines with http methodes for this route are defined.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If its better for you that the methodes object is in the IRoute interface i could propably change that but i dont think that this is accurat to the structure of the Layers in the Stack

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Revision needed This PR needs code changes before it can be merged. and removed Unreviewed No one showed up to review this PR, so it'll be reviewed by a DT maintainer. labels Dec 9, 2022
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Needs Maintainer Action to Needs Author Action in New Pull Request Status Board Dec 9, 2022
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@DerHerrGammler One or more reviewers has requested changes. Please address their comments. I'll be back once they sign off or you've pushed new commits. Thank you!

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Has Merge Conflict This PR can't be merged because it has a merge conflict. The author needs to update it. Abandoned This PR had no activity for a long time, and is considered abandoned labels Feb 14, 2023
@typescript-bot typescript-bot removed this from Needs Author Action in New Pull Request Status Board Feb 14, 2023
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@DerHerrGammler Unfortunately, this pull request currently has a merge conflict 😥. Please update your PR branch to be up-to-date with respect to master. Have a nice day!

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@DerHerrGammler To keep things tidy, we have to close PRs that aren't mergeable and don't have activity in the last month. No worries, though — please open a new PR if you'd like to continue with this change. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Abandoned This PR had no activity for a long time, and is considered abandoned Critical package Has Merge Conflict This PR can't be merged because it has a merge conflict. The author needs to update it. Revision needed This PR needs code changes before it can be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants