Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove videojs-hotkeys definitions, they're now in the library #63785

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Coteh
Copy link
Contributor

@Coteh Coteh commented Jan 3, 2023

ctd1500/videojs-hotkeys@6baf206

Please fill in this template.

  • Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.
  • Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)
  • Add or edit tests to reflect the change.
  • Follow the advice from the readme.
  • Avoid common mistakes.
  • Run npm test <package to test>. in this case, I ran npm run test-all since I'm removing the definitions. No errors.

Select one of these and delete the others:

If removing a declaration:

  • If a package was never on Definitely Typed, you don't need to do anything. (If you wrote a package and provided types, you don't need to register it with us.)
  • Delete the package's directory.
  • Add it to notNeededPackages.json.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

typescript-bot commented Jan 3, 2023

@Coteh Thank you for submitting this PR!

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

This PR touches some part of DefinitelyTyped infrastructure, so a DT maintainer will need to review it. This is rare — did you mean to do this?

1 package in this PR (and infra files)

Code Reviews

There aren't any other owners of this package, so a DT maintainer will review it.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

  • ✅ No merge conflicts
  • ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
  • ✅ A DT maintainer needs to approve changes which affect DT infrastructure (notNeededPackages.json)

All of the items on the list are green. To merge, you need to post a comment including the string "Ready to merge" to bring in your changes.

Inactive

This PR has been inactive for 10 days — please merge or say something if there's a problem, otherwise it will be closed!


Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR
{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 63785,
  "author": "Coteh",
  "headCommitOid": "3146cf0a0b3b6ccb42f925c2534b7654e407385a",
  "mergeBaseOid": "1dcd97e06e5b89b61500bf9907df4b0bc0f81ad6",
  "lastPushDate": "2023-01-03T00:58:47.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2023-03-18T03:58:42.000Z",
  "mergeOfferDate": "2023-03-18T03:59:26.000Z",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "hugeChange": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Well-liked by everyone",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": null,
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "notNeededPackages.json",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Critical"
    },
    {
      "name": "videojs-hotkeys",
      "kind": "delete",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/videojs-hotkeys/index.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/videojs-hotkeys/tsconfig.json",
          "kind": "package-meta-ok"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/videojs-hotkeys/tslint.json",
          "kind": "package-meta-ok"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/videojs-hotkeys/videojs-hotkeys-tests.ts",
          "kind": "test"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "Coteh"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Well-liked by everyone"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [
    {
      "type": "approved",
      "reviewer": "jakebailey",
      "date": "2023-01-03T21:24:11.000Z",
      "isMaintainer": true
    }
  ],
  "mainBotCommentID": 1369303911,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Edits Infrastructure No Other Owners This DT module only has one owner, so we can't have someone verify the change. labels Jan 3, 2023
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added this to Waiting for Code Reviews in New Pull Request Status Board Jan 3, 2023
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🔔 @Coteh — there are no owners, but it would still be good if you find someone to review this PR in the next few days, otherwise a maintainer will look at it. (And if you do find someone, maybe even recruit them to be a second owner to make future changes easier...)

Copy link
Member

@jakebailey jakebailey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but I'll leave the merge timing up to you, if you're trying to get ctd1500/videojs-hotkeys#83 in and released beforehand.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Maintainer Approved Self Merge This PR can now be self-merged by the PR author or an owner labels Jan 3, 2023
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Needs Maintainer Action to Waiting for Author to Merge in New Pull Request Status Board Jan 3, 2023
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the Unmerged The author did not merge the PR when it was ready. label Feb 14, 2023
@typescript-bot typescript-bot removed this from Waiting for Author to Merge in New Pull Request Status Board Feb 14, 2023
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

After a month, no one has requested merging the PR 😞. I'm going to assume that the change is not wanted after all, and will therefore close it.

@Coteh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Coteh commented Feb 14, 2023

LGTM but I'll leave the merge timing up to you, if you're trying to get ctd1500/videojs-hotkeys#83 in and released beforehand.

Yes I'm waiting for that PR to go in first so that the type definitions are in sync with what's in here.

Is it possible to get this PR reopened?

@jakebailey jakebailey reopened this Feb 14, 2023
@jakebailey
Copy link
Member

Done.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot removed the Unmerged The author did not merge the PR when it was ready. label Feb 14, 2023
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added this to Waiting for Author to Merge in New Pull Request Status Board Feb 14, 2023
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the Unmerged The author did not merge the PR when it was ready. label Feb 25, 2023
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Re-ping @Coteh / @«anyone?»:

This PR has been ready to merge for over a week, and I haven't seen any requests to merge it. I will close it on Mar 16th (in three weeks) if this doesn't happen.

(If there's no reason to avoid merging it, please do so. Otherwise, if it shouldn't be merged or if it needs more time, please close it or turn it into a draft.)

@typescript-bot typescript-bot removed this from Waiting for Author to Merge in New Pull Request Status Board Mar 18, 2023
@Coteh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Coteh commented Mar 18, 2023

@jakebailey Sorry, is it possible that this PR could be reopened again? Also, is it possible that the bot auto-closing can be disabled? If not, then I'll decide what to do with the PR by the time it comments again. Thanks.

@jakebailey
Copy link
Member

It cannot be disabled.

@jakebailey jakebailey reopened this Mar 18, 2023
@typescript-bot typescript-bot removed the Unmerged The author did not merge the PR when it was ready. label Mar 18, 2023
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added this to Waiting for Author to Merge in New Pull Request Status Board Mar 18, 2023
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the Unmerged The author did not merge the PR when it was ready. label Mar 28, 2023
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Re-ping @Coteh / @«anyone?»:

This PR has been ready to merge for over a week, and I haven't seen any requests to merge it. I will close it on Apr 17th (in three weeks) if this doesn't happen.

(If there's no reason to avoid merging it, please do so. Otherwise, if it shouldn't be merged or if it needs more time, please close it or turn it into a draft.)

@jakebailey
Copy link
Member

I'm going to convert this PR to a draft for now, given the upstream types are not getting accepted in short order and the bot wants to keep DT clean.

@jakebailey jakebailey marked this pull request as draft March 28, 2023 16:42
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Waiting for Author to Merge to Needs Author Action in New Pull Request Status Board Mar 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Edits Infrastructure Maintainer Approved No Other Owners This DT module only has one owner, so we can't have someone verify the change. Self Merge This PR can now be self-merged by the PR author or an owner Unmerged The author did not merge the PR when it was ready.
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants